[2023] KEHC 18949 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 18949 (KLR)

The court found that the application did not meet the threshold for certification as urgent. The court directed that the lower court file be photocopied, proceedings certified and availed, and that the application and order be served upon the respondent. The respondent is to file a response within the stipulated...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 18949 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Bhavin Motors Limited; Respondent: Republic; Defendant: Martin Wachera Mungai; Defendant: Henry Shakira Musee; Defendant: Fatuma Mohamed Baragu; Defendant: Paul Thorojo Wacera
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E533 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Setting Aside Lower Court Rulings and Retrieval of Motor Vehicle
Outcome
Application not certified urgent; directions issued for further steps.
Judges
DR Kavedza
Legal Topics
Criminal Revision, Retrieval of Property, Interlocutory Orders
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Criminal Revision Retrieval of Property Interlocutory Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bhavin Motors Limited

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Martin Wachera Mungai

Defendant

Henry Shakira Musee

Defendant

Fatuma Mohamed Baragu

Defendant

Paul Thorojo Wacera

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Setting Aside Lower Court Rulings and Retrieval of Motor Vehicle

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to have the rulings of December 14, 2022 and March 29, 2023 set aside.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant should be allowed to retrieve motor vehicle registration number KCZ 695L from the Director of Criminal Investigation Anti Narcotic Unit Headquarters.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application did not meet the threshold for certification as urgent. The court directed that the lower court file be photocopied, proceedings certified and availed, and that the application and order be served upon the respondent. The respondent is to file a response within the stipulated period, and the matter is to be mentioned for directions. No substantive orders were issued on the merits of the application at this stage.

Court Disposition

Application not certified urgent; directions issued for further steps.

Orders

  • The application is not certified urgent.
  • The lower court file to be photocopied, proceedings certified and availed untyped on 3/7/2023.