[2021] KEELRC 890 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 890 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant's termination was unlawful, adopting the reasoning and findings from the test case in Cause No. 1045 of 2017. The court held that the claimant was entitled to remedies under Section 49 of the Employment Act, including one month's salary in lieu of notice, salary for days worked, six...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 890 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Billy Kimani Maina; Respondent: Nation Media Group Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1046 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
claim allowed in part
Judges
AN Mwaure
Legal Topics
Unlawful Termination, Remedies for Unlawful Dismissal, Test Suit Procedure, Statutory Entitlements, Procedural Fairness
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unlawful Termination Remedies for Unlawful Dismissal Test Suit Procedure Statutory Entitlements Procedural Fairness

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Billy Kimani Maina

Claimant

Nation Media Group Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the claimant's employment was unlawful.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to remedies under Section 49 of the Employment Act.
  3. 3 Whether the suit qualifies as a test case under Section 24 of the Employment and Labour Relations Court (Procedure) Rules 2016.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant's termination was unlawful, adopting the reasoning and findings from the test case in Cause No. 1045 of 2017. The court held that the claimant was entitled to remedies under Section 49 of the Employment Act, including one month's salary in lieu of notice, salary for days worked, six months' salary as compensation, and unpaid annual leave. The claim for house allowance was rejected as the contract specified an all-inclusive salary and the claimant had not raised the issue during employment. The court also declined to award consequential loss, finding the compensation adequate. The suit was properly treated as a test case under Section 24 of the Employment...

Court Disposition

claim allowed in part

Orders

  • The claimant is awarded Kshs.562,711 plus costs, subject to statutory deductions.
  • Interest at court rates is awarded from the date of judgment until full payment.