[2021] KECA 441 (KLR)
The court found that there was insufficient evidence that all respondents had been properly served with the application and supporting documents as required by the Deputy Registrar's directions. In the interest of fairness and to ensure all parties have an opportunity to respond, the court ordered compliance with...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KECA 441 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Bintomari Jumaa Gogo; Applicant: Hamisi Amri Mazu (Suing as personal representatives of the Estate of Amri Mchoro Mwamuri (Deceased)); Respondent: Matano Mwasia; Respondent: Ibrahim Njoroge Kimani; Respondent: Betina Malther; Respondent: Swan Island Limited; Respondent: Moses Kaberi Kariuki; Respondent: Dickson Otieno Akeno; Respondent: Christine Mumbi Miano
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Application 35 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal
- Outcome
- Directions issued for service and filing; application to be listed for hearing on a priority basis; no orders as to costs.
- Judges
- KI Laibuta
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeal Out of Time, Service of Process, Environment and Land Court Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bintomari Jumaa Gogo
Applicant
Hamisi Amri Mazu (Suing as personal representatives of the Estate of Amri Mchoro Mwamuri (Deceased))
Applicant
Matano Mwasia
Respondent
Ibrahim Njoroge Kimani
Respondent
Betina Malther
Respondent
Swan Island Limited
Respondent
Moses Kaberi Kariuki
Respondent
Dickson Otieno Akeno
Respondent
Christine Mumbi Miano
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants should be granted an extension of time to file and serve a notice of appeal and record of appeal out of time.
- 2 Whether service of the application and submissions was properly effected on all respondents.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there was insufficient evidence that all respondents had been properly served with the application and supporting documents as required by the Deputy Registrar's directions. In the interest of fairness and to ensure all parties have an opportunity to respond, the court ordered compliance with the service and filing requirements before the application for extension of time could be heard. The court did not determine the substantive application but issued directions to regularize the process and ensure procedural fairness.
Court Disposition
Directions issued for service and filing; application to be listed for hearing on a priority basis; no orders as to costs.
Orders
- Applicants to file affidavit of service and all accompanying documents, including written submissions, within seven days.
- Respondents to file and serve replying affidavits and written submissions within seven days of service.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
40 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT MOMBASA
(CORAM: DR. K. I. LAIBUTA, J.A. (IN CHAMBERS)
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 35 OF 2021
BETWEEN
BINTOMARI JUMAA GOGO
HAMISI AMRI MAZU (Suing
as personal representatives of the
Estate of Amri Mchoro Mwamuri
(Deceased))........................................................................................APPLICANTS
AND
MATANO MWASIA.................................................................1stRESPONDENT
IBRAHIM NJOROGE KIMANI..........................................2NDRESPONDENT
BETINA MALTHER.............................................................3RDRESPONDENT
SWAN ISLAND LIMITED...................................................4THRESPONDENT
MOSES KABERI KARIUKI...............................................5THRESPONDENT
DICKSON OTIENO AKENO.............................................6THRESPONDENT
CHRISTINE MUMBI MIANO...........................................7THRESPONDENT
(Being an application for extension of time to file an Appeal out of time,against the Ruling of Justice C. K. Yano, delivered on 16thJuly, 2020
inMombasa Environment and Land Court Case No. 120 of 2007 (O.S))
******************
RULING
Background
Before me is a Notice of Motion dated 18th May 2021 made under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules in which the Applicants, suing as personal representatives of the estate of Amri Nchoro Mwamuri, seek extension of time pursuant to Rule 4 to file and serve a Notice of Appeal and Record of Appeal from the Ruling of Hon. Justice C. K. Yano delivered on 16th July 2020 in Mombasa Environment and Land Court Case No. 120 of 2007 (OS). The application has been duly served on the four counsel for the Respondents. Today’s hearing was notified to the parties by email on 1st July 2021 in which the Deputy Registrar directed that –
(a) the Applicant do file and serve online written submissions and any other documents if they had not done so within 2 days (by 3rd July 2021);
(b) the Respondents do file and serve all parties with written submissions within 2 days from the date of service (by 5th July 2021); and
(c) all documents be filed latest 24 hours before the date of hearing scheduled for today 6th July 2021 at 9. 00Am.
There is nothing on record to show that service of the application has been served on all the parties as directed, with the exception of M/s. Kiarie Kariuki and Co. Advocates, who have acknowledged service, but who, by their email of 2nd July 2021, indicated that they would not be in a position to file their submissions due to the short time allowed.
In order to give the parties a fair opportunity to be served with the application, file their replies and written submissions, and be heard, I direct that the parties do comply with the orders of the Deputy Registrar and, in particular –
(a) the Applicants do file their affidavit of service of the application and all accompanying documents, including their written submissions, within seven days from the date hereof;
(b) the respondents do file and serve their respective replying affidavits (if they so wish) together with their written submission within7 days from the date of service;
(c) the Applicants’ Notice of Motion dated 18th May 2021 be listed for hearing on a priority basis;
(d) there be no orders as to costs.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 9TH DAY OF JULY 2021
DR. K. I. LAIBUTA
..............................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original
Signed
DEPUTY REGISTRAR