[2019] KEHC 950 (KLR)
The court found that the sentences imposed by the trial court for both counts were proper and lawful, having considered the evidence, the nature and gravity of the offences, and the injuries suffered by the 7-year-old victim. The trial court had conducted proceedings lawfully and considered mitigation before...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 950 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Bob Nyakundi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisii
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 147 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Sentence Review Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Review, Unnatural Offence, Indecent Act With Child, Penal Code Section 162, Sexual Offences Act Section 11, Mitigation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bob Nyakundi
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Sentence Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of 20 years imprisonment imposed on the applicant was manifestly harsh and excessive.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a review of his sentence to community service given his mitigation as a first offender and sole breadwinner.
- 3 Whether the trial court properly applied the law in sentencing the applicant for offences under section 162(a) of the Penal Code and section 11(1) of the Sexual Offences Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the sentences imposed by the trial court for both counts were proper and lawful, having considered the evidence, the nature and gravity of the offences, and the injuries suffered by the 7-year-old victim. The trial court had conducted proceedings lawfully and considered mitigation before sentencing. The severity of the harm to the victim, including physical injuries and lasting trauma, outweighed the applicant's mitigation. The statutory minimum and maximum sentences under the Penal Code and Sexual Offences Act were properly applied. The application for sentence review was therefore dismissed, and the applicant was ordered to continue serving his sentence.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for review of sentence is dismissed.
- The applicant shall continue to serve his sentence as imposed by the trial court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISII
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 2409 OF 2009 AT KISII LAW COURT
MISC APPLICATION NO. 147 OF 2019
BOB NYAKUNDI...........................................................APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC..................................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. Bob Nyakundiseeks a review of his sentence. He states that he is satisfied with the judgment passed by the subordinate court on the 26th February 2010. He was charged with the offence of Unnatural offence under the Penal Code and indecent act under the Sexual Offences Act and sentenced to 20 years imprisonment. He avers that he pleaded guilty to the charge and that he did not intend to commit the crime in question. That the 20 years imprisonment is manifestly harsh and excessive and he seeks to have the sentence reviewed to community service. He contends that he is a first offender, a good citizen, he is the sole bread winner of his family and that his wife is unable to provide all the basic needs of their family. That he will abide by the rule of the law, he has gone through rehabilitation while in prison.
2. The applicant had filed an appeal which he withdrew in court on the 3rd August 2018. Whilst sentencing the applicant the trial court noted that the victim would not able a normal life and sentenced the applicant to 20 years each on each count. In count no. 1 he was charged with the offence of, “unlawful offence contrary to section 162 (a) of the Penal Code”. The 2nd count was a charge of “indecent act with a child contrary to section 11 (1) of the sexual Offence Act.” As per the Penal Code section 162 provides a s follows; Provided that, in the case of an offence under paragraph (a), the offender shall be liable to imprisonment for twenty-one years if—
(i)the offence was committed without the consent of the person who was carnally known;
Section 11 (1) of the Sexual Offences Act provides as follows;
(1)Any person who commits an indecent act with a child is guilty of the offence of committing an indecent act with a child and is liable upon conviction to imprisonment for a term of not less than ten years.
3. At the hearing of this application the Respondent indicated that they left it to the court to decide on the application. The sentence meted out on the applicant in Count No. 1 and Count 2 respectively were proper in law. After considering the evidence led before the trial court, I note that the court proceedings were done in a proper and lawful way and the sentencing after mitigation was as per the law. Of essence is what happened and the injuries inflicted on the victim. The victim a 7 year girl suffered a tear in her anal area. The walls were swollen, lacerated and painful and the sphincter was torn. Considering all that happened and what the victim underwent, I am inclined to decline the applicant’s application and dismiss his application to review his sentence as sought. His application is dismissed. He shall continue to serve his sentence.
Dated signed and delivered at Kisii on the 13th day of November 2019.
R.E.OUGO
JUDGE
In the presence of;
Applicant In Person
Mr. Otieno Senior State Counsel in the office of the DPP
Ms. Rael Clerk Court