[2015] KEHC 966 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 966 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant did not give consent to the confirmation of the grant and that the distribution of the estate was not in accordance with the requirements for intestate succession under the Law of Succession Act. The absence of certified title documents and the lack of consent from all...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 966 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Bonfas Murigi Rutere; Respondent: Julius Kamande Chomba
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Naivasha
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 7 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant
Outcome
confirmed grant revoked; rectified grant to be issued; directions for future confirmation process
Judges
CW Meoli
Legal Topics
Intestate Succession, Revocation of Grant, Beneficiary Consent, Confirmation of Grant
Source Language
en
Family and Children Intestate Succession Revocation of Grant Beneficiary Consent Confirmation of Grant

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bonfas Murigi Rutere

Applicant

Julius Kamande Chomba

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Revocation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether the confirmed grant dated 29th October, 2014 should be revoked due to lack of consent from all beneficiaries.
  2. 2 Whether the distribution of the estate was adverse to the interests of some beneficiaries, including the applicant.
  3. 3 Whether the estate was distributed in accordance with the law of intestate succession.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant did not give consent to the confirmation of the grant and that the distribution of the estate was not in accordance with the requirements for intestate succession under the Law of Succession Act. The absence of certified title documents and the lack of consent from all beneficiaries rendered the confirmation proceedings defective. Consequently, the confirmed grant dated 29th October, 2014 was revoked. The court ordered that a rectified grant be issued in the names of three administrators, representing the principal beneficiaries, and set out a process for proper confirmation of the grant with the participation and consent of all identified beneficiaries.

Court Disposition

confirmed grant revoked; rectified grant to be issued; directions for future confirmation process

Orders

  • The confirmed grant dated 29th October, 2014 is revoked.
  • A rectified grant shall be issued in the names of Bonfas Murigi Rutere, Julius Kamande Chomba, and Tabitha Muthoni Chomba.