[2003] KECA 91 (KLR)

[2003] KECA 91 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's delay in filing the appeal was justified as it was caused by the failure to obtain a copy of the judgment in time. Since the respondent did not oppose the application, the court exercised its discretion to allow the extension of time, enabling the applicant to file the appeal...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2003] KECA 91 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Boniface Emuria Loro; Respondent: Republic
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 225 of 2002
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Late Filing
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Extension of Time Appeal Procedure Late Filing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Boniface Emuria Loro

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's delay in filing the appeal was justified as it was caused by the failure to obtain a copy of the judgment in time. Since the respondent did not oppose the application, the court exercised its discretion to allow the extension of time, enabling the applicant to file the appeal within seven days.

Court Disposition

Application allowed.

Orders

  • The applicant is granted leave to file the appeal out of time.
  • The applicant must file the appeal within seven (7) days.