[1999] KECA 153 (KLR)

[1999] KECA 153 (KLR)

The Court held that the omission of the full proceedings from the record of appeal was a breach of rule 85(1)(d) of the Court of Appeal Rules. The Court emphasized that the requirement to include such documents is mandatory and not subject to the appellant's discretion under rule 85(3). As the proceedings were...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1999] KECA 153 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Boniface Kaguo Mwangi; Applicant: Contratours Limited; Respondent: Sanken Limited
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 183 of 1998
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application to Strike Out Appeal
Outcome
Appeal struck out with costs to the applicants, including costs of the motion filed on 26th November, 1998.
Legal Topics
Record of Appeal, Striking Out Appeal, Court of Appeal Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Record of Appeal Striking Out Appeal Court of Appeal Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Boniface Kaguo Mwangi

Applicant

Contratours Limited

Applicant

Sanken Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application to Strike Out Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appeal should be struck out for failure to include full proceedings in the record of appeal as required by rule 85(1)(d) of the Court of Appeal Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant can decide the relevance or necessity of documents to be included in the record of appeal under rule 85(3).

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the omission of the full proceedings from the record of appeal was a breach of rule 85(1)(d) of the Court of Appeal Rules. The Court emphasized that the requirement to include such documents is mandatory and not subject to the appellant's discretion under rule 85(3). As the proceedings were admittedly not included, the appeal was fatally defective and had to be struck out. The application to strike out the notice of appeal and the appeal was therefore allowed, with costs to the applicants.

Court Disposition

Appeal struck out with costs to the applicants, including costs of the motion filed on 26th November, 1998.

Orders

  • The appeal is struck out.
  • The notice of appeal is struck out.