[2017] KEELC 2299 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 2299 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds at the ex parte stage to warrant preservation of the suit land. The applicant showed he had been in possession of the land for a significant period, had a written agreement for purchase, and that there was a risk the land could be alienated...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 2299 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Bornface Gitari Kirimo; Defendant: Dynah Kangai Albert (sued as administratrix of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi); Defendant: Felix Kirimi Mucheke (sued as beneficiary of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi); Defendant: Joseline Ciautegi Mucheke (sued as beneficiary of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi); Defendant: Rose Cirindi Albert (sued as beneficiary of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi); Defendant: Bessu Kanjiru Albert (sued as beneficiary of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi); Defendant: Lisper Kendi Mucheke (sued as beneficiary of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 269 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ex Parte Interim Application for Inhibition Order Pending Hearing
Outcome
interim inhibition order granted ex parte pending inter partes hearing
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Land Inhibition Orders, Succession and Administration, Trusts in Land, Land Sale Agreements
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Adverse Possession Land Inhibition Orders Succession and Administration Trusts in Land Land Sale Agreements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bornface Gitari Kirimo

Plaintiff

Dynah Kangai Albert (sued as administratrix of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi)

Defendant

Felix Kirimi Mucheke (sued as beneficiary of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi)

Defendant

Joseline Ciautegi Mucheke (sued as beneficiary of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi)

Defendant

Rose Cirindi Albert (sued as beneficiary of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi)

Defendant

Bessu Kanjiru Albert (sued as beneficiary of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi)

Defendant

Lisper Kendi Mucheke (sued as beneficiary of the estate of Albert Murera Ngarumi)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ex Parte Interim Application for Inhibition Order Pending Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an inhibition order against the suit land parcels pending determination of the main suit.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated a prima facie case for preservation of the suit land through inhibition.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant has acquired ownership of a portion of the suit land by adverse possession or operation of law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds at the ex parte stage to warrant preservation of the suit land. The applicant showed he had been in possession of the land for a significant period, had a written agreement for purchase, and that there was a risk the land could be alienated through subdivision or transfer by the respondents. To prevent prejudice and maintain the status quo pending full hearing, the court granted an inhibition order against the suit parcels, pending inter partes hearing of the application. The court emphasized the need to preserve the subject matter to avoid rendering the main suit nugatory.

Court Disposition

interim inhibition order granted ex parte pending inter partes hearing

Orders

  • Prayer 2 for inhibition pending hearing and determination of this application is granted.
  • Costs shall be in the cause.