[2018] KEELC 4313 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 4313 (KLR)

The court found that the Plaintiff had established lawful ownership of Plot No. 757 through documentary evidence, including a sale agreement and membership card. The Defendant, having failed to appear or file a defence, did not controvert the Plaintiff's evidence. The court held that the Plaintiff had proved his...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 4313 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Bosco Nthenge Nzioki; Defendant: Wayua Muema
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Machakos
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 204 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim allowed; orders of eviction and permanent injunction granted; costs awarded to Plaintiff.
Judges
OA Angote
Legal Topics
Trespass to Land, Eviction Orders, Permanent Injunctions
Source Language
en
Land and Property Trespass to Land Eviction Orders Permanent Injunctions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bosco Nthenge Nzioki

Plaintiff

Wayua Muema

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land and Property Suit / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff is the lawful owner of Plot No. 757, Katelembo Athiani Muputi Farming and Ranching Co-operative Society Limited.
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant unlawfully encroached and trespassed on the Plaintiff's land.
  3. 3 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to an order of eviction and permanent injunction against the Defendant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Plaintiff had established lawful ownership of Plot No. 757 through documentary evidence, including a sale agreement and membership card. The Defendant, having failed to appear or file a defence, did not controvert the Plaintiff's evidence. The court held that the Plaintiff had proved his case on a balance of probabilities, entitling him to an order of eviction and a permanent injunction against the Defendant. The Defendant's continued occupation constituted trespass, and the Plaintiff was entitled to the reliefs sought, including costs.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim allowed; orders of eviction and permanent injunction granted; costs awarded to Plaintiff.

Orders

  • An order of eviction of the Defendant from Plot No. 757-Katelembo Athiani Muputi Farming and Ranching Co-operative Society Limited is issued.
  • A permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, her servants and agents from entering or interfering with the Plaintiff’s Plot No. 757-Katelembo is issued.