[2017] KEELRC 529 (KLR)
The court found that although the respondent as named, Ram Feeds Industry, was not a legal entity capable of being sued, the misdescription was based on the job identity card provided to the claimant. The court held that the error could be cured by amendment, as amendments are generously allowed at early stages. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELRC 529 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Brian Omindi Shem; Respondent: Ram Feeds Industry
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 380 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/application to Strike Out for Want of Legal Capacity
- Outcome
- Application to strike out dismissed; leave to amend granted.
- Judges
- MSA Makhandia
- Legal Topics
- Misjoinder of Parties, Amendment of Pleadings, Employer Identification, Preliminary Objection, Employment Contracts
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brian Omindi Shem
Claimant
Ram Feeds Industry
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/application to Strike Out for Want of Legal Capacity
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent, Ram Feeds Industry, is a legal entity capable of being sued.
- 2 Whether the misdescription of the respondent can be cured by amendment of pleadings.
- 3 Whether the claimant should be granted leave to amend the Memorandum of Claim to reflect the proper respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the respondent as named, Ram Feeds Industry, was not a legal entity capable of being sued, the misdescription was based on the job identity card provided to the claimant. The court held that the error could be cured by amendment, as amendments are generously allowed at early stages. The claimant was therefore granted leave to amend the Memorandum of Claim to reflect the correct respondent, and the respondent was given liberty to file an amended response. Costs were ordered in the cause.
Court Disposition
Application to strike out dismissed; leave to amend granted.
Orders
- The claimant to file and serve an Amended Memorandum of Claim on or before 10 November 2017.
- The respondent be at liberty to file (amended) response within 21 days of service.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT AT NAKURU
CAUSE NO. 380 OF 2016
BRIAN OMINDI SHEM CLAIMANT
v
RAM FEEDS INDUSTRY RESPONDENT
RULING
1. Brian Omindi Shem (Claimant) through the firm of M. Korongo & Co. Advocates sued Ram Feeds Industry alleging breach of contract/unfair termination of employment.
2. The Respondent instructed successive firms of Advocates culminating in a Notice of Change of Advocates filed in Court by Ochweri Ngamate & Co. Advocates on 22 June 2017.
3. On the same date, the aforesaid firm filed a motion seeking
1. …
2. THAT the Claimants Cause be dismissed with costs to the Respondent as the Respondent is not a legal entity that can be sued.
3. ….
4. When the motion was placed before Court on 13 July 2017, the Court directed that it be served upon the Claimant and scheduled the hearing on 21 September 2017.
5. The application was served upon the Claimant and he filed a replying affidavit in opposition on 10 July 2017.
6. When the motion came up as scheduled, the Court confirmed that it would hear the parties, but when it was later called out after going through the cause list, Ms. Kerubo for the Claimant was not in Court.
7. Because Ms. Kerubo had not disclosed to the Court of any other engagements she might have been involved in and her whereabouts were not known, the Court allowed Mr. Bosire to prosecute the application.
8. One of the documents relied upon by the Respondent to urge that it was not a legal entity capable of being sued is a certificate of business name registration issued to one Frankline Murega Etyangcarrying on business as RAM FEEDS ANIMAL PRODUCTS.
9. In the replying affidavit, the Claimant indicated that he would seek leave to amend the Memorandum of Claim.
10. Among the documents which the Claimant had filed in Court with the Memorandum of Claim was a job identity card embossed with the name RAM FEEDS INDUSTRY.
11. It is apparent that the Claimant sued the entity listed in the job identity card as the employer. The Claimant may not be faulted in that regard as section 9 of the Employment Act, 2007 requires an employer to issue a formal contract to an employee disclosing the name and or identity of the employer.
12. In the view of the Court, the misnomer as to the correct person to be sued can be cured by appropriate amendment to bring out the proper Respondent.
13. The law is that amendments are generously allowed at this early stages of proceedings.
14. The Court therefore orders that
(a) the Claimant to file and serve an Amended Memorandum of Claim on or before 10 November 2017.
(b) Respondent be at liberty to file (amended) Response within 21 days of service.
(c) Costs in the Cause.
Delivered, dated and signed in Nakuru on this 6th day of November 2017.
Radido Stephen
Judge
Appearances
For Claimant M. Korongo & Co. Advocates
For Respondent Mr. Bosire instructed by Ochweri Ngamate & Co. Advocates
Court Assistants Nixon/Martin