[2018] KEHC 2234 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 2234 (KLR)

The court held that since the applicant had already served the sentence imposed for the offence of stealing, the application for review was brought too late and was therefore incompetent. The sentence was found to be lawful, and the Sentence Review Report confirmed that the sentence had been fully served through...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 2234 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Brian Owino Danga; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision 73 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed as moot; file closed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Sentence Review, Remission of Sentence, Conviction on Guilty Plea
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentence Review Remission of Sentence Conviction on Guilty Plea

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Brian Owino Danga

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the application for review of sentence is competent after the sentence has already been served.
  2. 2 Whether the sentence imposed was lawful.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since the applicant had already served the sentence imposed for the offence of stealing, the application for review was brought too late and was therefore incompetent. The sentence was found to be lawful, and the Sentence Review Report confirmed that the sentence had been fully served through remission. As there was no longer any sentence to review, the court ordered the file closed for archiving.

Court Disposition

application dismissed as moot; file closed

Orders

  • The file is marked as closed for archiving purposes.