[2024] KEHC 13199 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 13199 (KLR)

The court found that the appellant satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal as set out in Order 42 Rule 6(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules. The appellant demonstrated willingness to provide security by depositing the decretal sum in a joint interest earning account, and the application...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 13199 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Britam General Insurance Company Limited; Respondent: Sammy Kyala (Suing as the Legal Representative of the Estate of Kilaku Kyalya (Deceased))
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E689 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application for stay of execution pending appeal allowed with conditions.
Judges
JN Mulwa
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Security for Decretal Sum, Judicial Discretion, Appeal Conditions
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Security for Decretal Sum Judicial Discretion Appeal Conditions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Britam General Insurance Company Limited

Appellant

Sammy Kyala (Suing as the Legal Representative of the Estate of Kilaku Kyalya (Deceased))

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether security for the due performance of the decree should be furnished and in what form.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the appellant satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal as set out in Order 42 Rule 6(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules. The appellant demonstrated willingness to provide security by depositing the decretal sum in a joint interest earning account, and the application was made without unreasonable delay. The court exercised its discretion in favour of the appellant, guided by precedent, and ordered that the decretal sum be deposited as security within thirty days, failing which the stay would lapse.

Court Disposition

Application for stay of execution pending appeal allowed with conditions.

Orders

  • The appellant shall deposit the sum of Kshs. 1,041,033.00 in a joint interest earning account in the names of the parties' advocates within thirty (30) days from the date of the ruling.
  • In default of the above, the stay granted shall automatically lapse.