[2021] KEELC 1227 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 1227 (KLR)

The court found that the application to set aside ex-parte proceedings and to enjoin the proposed interested party was made after judgment had already been delivered, rendering the court functus officio. There was no sufficient explanation for the delay in bringing the application, which was filed more than a year...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 1227 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Broadlands Kenya Ltd; Defendant: City Council of Nairobi; Defendant: Moses Mulehi; Defendant: Oscar Bettah; Defendant: Mr. N. Njeru; Defendant: Mr. Okalla; Defendant: Mr. Omondi t/a Ngei II Security; Defendant: Mrs. Muhoro c/o Langata Junior School; Applicant: Trustees of Ngei II Residents Association
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 450 of 2008
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Post Judgment Application for Joinder and Setting Aside Ex Parte Proceedings
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
LC Komingoi
Legal Topics
Joinder of Parties, Setting Aside Ex Parte Judgment, Functus Officio, Abuse of Court Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Joinder of Parties Setting Aside Ex Parte Judgment Functus Officio Abuse of Court Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Broadlands Kenya Ltd

Plaintiff

City Council of Nairobi

Defendant

Moses Mulehi

Defendant

Oscar Bettah

Defendant

Mr. N. Njeru

Defendant

Mr. Okalla

Defendant

Mr. Omondi t/a Ngei II Security

Defendant

Mrs. Muhoro c/o Langata Junior School

Defendant

Trustees of Ngei II Residents Association

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Post Judgment Application for Joinder and Setting Aside Ex Parte Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether the court should set aside ex-parte proceedings and reopen the case for hearing afresh.
  2. 2 Whether the proposed interested party should be enjoined to the suit after judgment has been delivered.
  3. 3 Whether the delay in bringing the application is justified.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application to set aside ex-parte proceedings and to enjoin the proposed interested party was made after judgment had already been delivered, rendering the court functus officio. There was no sufficient explanation for the delay in bringing the application, which was filed more than a year after judgment. The court held that joining a new party to a concluded matter would amount to an abuse of court process. Consequently, the application lacked merit and was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application dated 3rd May 2021 is dismissed.
  • No orders as to costs.