[2018] KEHC 2711 (KLR)
The court found that the application was unopposed and there was no dispute as to retainer. The certificate of taxation issued for Kshs. 234,157.64 was not challenged by the respondents. The court held that, in accordance with Section 51 of the Advocates Act, the certificate of taxation could be adopted as a...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 2711 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Bruce Odeny & Company Advocates; Respondent: Gem Gen Power Co. Ltd; Respondent: Walter Edwin Ominde
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application 203 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- TW Cherere
- Legal Topics
- Advocate Client Bill of Costs, Taxation of Costs, Interest on Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bruce Odeny & Company Advocates
Applicant
Gem Gen Power Co. Ltd
Respondent
Walter Edwin Ominde
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the certificate of taxation should be adopted as a judgment of the court.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to interest on the taxed costs and from what date.
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to the costs of the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application was unopposed and there was no dispute as to retainer. The certificate of taxation issued for Kshs. 234,157.64 was not challenged by the respondents. The court held that, in accordance with Section 51 of the Advocates Act, the certificate of taxation could be adopted as a judgment of the court. Regarding interest, the court applied Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order, noting that interest at 14% per annum is chargeable from 30 days after service of the bill. As there was no evidence of the exact date of service, the court used the date when the respondents' counsel entered appearance as the date of service. The application was allowed, judgment...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- Judgment entered for the advocate against the respondents for Kshs. 234,157.64.
- Interest shall accrue on the taxed costs at 14% per annum from 3.11.2017 until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KISUMU
(CORAM: CHERERE-J)
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO 203 of 2017
BETWEEN
BRUCE ODENY & COMPANY ADVOCATES...............APPLICANT/ADVOCATE
AND
GEM GEN POWER CO. LTD..........................................1STRESPONDENT/CLIENT
WALTER EDWIN OMINDE.........................................2ND RESPONDENT/CLIENT
JUDGMENT
1. By a notice of motion dated 14. 6.18, brought under Section 51 of the Advocates Act Cap16 Laws of Kenya; the applicant prays for orders THAT: -
a.The taxation order dated 11. 6.18 be deemed as a judgment of this court and a decree for the payment of the costs taxed together with interest do issue
b.THAT the costs of this application be provided for
2. The motion is premised on the grounds on the body of the application and the supporting affidavit sworn on 14. 6.18 by Bruce O. Odeny, advocate of the High Court of Kenya. He avers that the bill of costs which relates to formation of Gem Gen. Co. Ltd on instructions of the 2nd respondent was taxed on 24. 5.18for the sum of Kshs. 234,157. 64 and a certificate of taxation (Marked BOO-1) was issued for the said sum. He additionally avers that the clients have not paid the said amount and the applicant requests for judgment for the entire sum.
3. When the application came for hearing on 27. 9.18, Mr. Nyamweya, advocate for the client requested for time to file a response to the application there was no response to the application.I fixed the application for Judgment on 25. 10. 18 and directed the respondents to file their response before then. At the time of writing this judgment, no response had been filed. The application is therefore unopposed and there is thus no dispute as to retainer.
4. Regarding interest, I have considered the provisions of Rule 7 of the Advocates Remuneration Order which provides: -
“An advocate may charge interest at 14% per annum on his disbursements and costs, whether by scale or otherwise, from the expiration of one month from the delivery of his bill to the client, providing such claim for interest is raised before the amount of the bill has been paid or tendered in full.”
5. The rate of interest awardable is applicable from 30 days after the date of service of the Bill of Costs. There is no evidence to show when the Bill of Costs was served. I will therefore apply 3. 10. 2017 when the respondents‘counsel entered appearance as the date of service of the Bill. Thirty (30) days from 3. 10. 17 expired on 3. 11. 7.
6. The upshot of this is that the notice of motion dated 14. 6.18, succeeds and is allowed in the following terms:
a) Judgment is hereby entered for the advocate against the Respondent for Kshs. 234,157. 64
b) Interest shall accrue on the taxed costs at 14% per annum from3. 11. 17until payment in full
c) The Advocate will also have the costs of this application.
DATED AND SIGNED IN KISUMU THIS25th DAY OF October2018
T.W. CHERERE
JUDGE
Read in open court in the presence of-
Court Assistant - Felix
Applicant - N/A
Respondent - N/A