[2024] KEHC 412 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 412 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant, having a receiving order against her, lacked capacity to litigate in her own name or seek stay of criminal proceedings. The receiving order had not been gazetted, rendering it ineffective for the purposes claimed. The court further held that the applicant's repeated applications...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 412 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Susan Ombunya Bukoshe; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E003 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings and Review/quashing of Criminal Charges
Outcome
application struck out as incompetent
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Stay of Proceedings, Bankruptcy Effect on Criminal Proceedings, Forum Shopping, Quashing of Charges
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Stay of Proceedings Bankruptcy Effect on Criminal Proceedings Forum Shopping Quashing of Charges

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Susan Ombunya Bukoshe

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Proceedings and Review/quashing of Criminal Charges

  1. 1 Whether the applicant, subject to a receiving order in bankruptcy, can seek stay or quashing of criminal proceedings against her in her own name.
  2. 2 Whether the criminal charges against the applicant are civil in nature and should be quashed due to the bankruptcy proceedings.
  3. 3 Whether repeated applications for similar orders in different courts amount to forum shopping.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant, having a receiving order against her, lacked capacity to litigate in her own name or seek stay of criminal proceedings. The receiving order had not been gazetted, rendering it ineffective for the purposes claimed. The court further held that the applicant's repeated applications for similar relief in various courts amounted to forum shopping and an abuse of process. The application was therefore incompetent and struck out. The court emphasized that the applicant was previously advised to seek guidance from the Official Receiver but failed to do so, and that the criminal proceedings could not be stayed or quashed on the basis of the un-gazetted receiving...

Court Disposition

application struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • The application dated 29th November 2023 is struck out with no orders as to costs.
  • Applicant to be notified.