[2024] KEHC 12612 (KLR)
The court found that, following the commutation of the death sentence to life imprisonment and in light of the Court of Appeal's decisions declaring life imprisonment unconstitutional, the petitioner was entitled to benefit from the new jurisprudence. The court set aside the life sentence and substituted it with a...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 12612 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Patrick Makokha Buluma; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Busia
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Petition E005A of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Petition / Ruling on Sentence Review
- Outcome
- petition allowed in part; sentence reviewed
- Judges
- WM Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Review, Death Penalty, Life Imprisonment, Robbery With Violence, Constitutional Rights, Judicial Discretion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Makokha Buluma
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Petition / Ruling on Sentence Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of life imprisonment imposed on the petitioner is unconstitutional in light of recent Court of Appeal decisions.
- 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to a definite term of imprisonment instead of life imprisonment following the commutation of his death sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, following the commutation of the death sentence to life imprisonment and in light of the Court of Appeal's decisions declaring life imprisonment unconstitutional, the petitioner was entitled to benefit from the new jurisprudence. The court set aside the life sentence and substituted it with a definite term of 30 years' imprisonment, guided by the reasoning in Evans Nyamari Ayako vs. Republic. The court considered the gravity of the offence, including the violence and sexual assault involved, and determined that a 30-year sentence was appropriate under the circumstances.
Court Disposition
petition allowed in part; sentence reviewed
Orders
- The sentence of life imprisonment is set aside.
- The petitioner is sentenced to 30 years' imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Buluma v Republic (Criminal Petition E005A of 2022) [2024] KEHC 12612 (KLR) (22 October 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 12612 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Busia
Criminal Petition E005A of 2022
WM Musyoka, J
October 22, 2024
Between
Patrick Makokha Buluma
Petitioner
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. I delivered a ruling herein on 9th September 2023, where I put off determination of the petition herein, as it appeared that the petitioner had filed an appeal at the Court of Appeal, but the determination of that appeal had not been disclosed.
2. The petition was seeking review of the death sentence imposed by the trial court, in view of the recent jurisprudence, on the death penalty. I noted that the death sentence was no longer hanging over the head of the petitioner, as it had been commuted to life imprisonment by the President of the Republic, on 3rd August 2009, according to the petition. I ruled that I would only entertain the petition on account of the decision of the Court of Appeal, in Julius Kitsao Manyeso vs. Republic Malindi CACRA No. 12 of 2021 (Nyamweya, Lesiit & Odunga, JJA), to the effect that the sentence of life imprisonment is unconstitutional, and, to facilitate that, I directed that records from the Court of Appeal, in Kisumu CACRA No. 291 of 2012, be made available, or otherwise the petitioner to update the court on the status of that appeal.
3. When the matter was mentioned on 15th April 2024, the petitioner indicated that he had no appeal, at the Court of Appeal. He stated that he had filed his written submissions. Whereupon the respondent stated it would also file theirs. Both sides did file written submissions. I have read through them, and noted the arguments made.
4. The petitioner was convicted of robbery with violence, and was sentenced to death, by the trial court, in Busia CMCCRC No. 1251 of 2007, on 24th November 2008. He had filed an appeal at the High Court, being Busia HCCRA No. 11 of 2009, but his appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence for robbery with violence affirmed and confirmed, on 10th November 2014.
5. The Court of Appeal, in Julius Kitsao Manyeso vs. Republic Malindi CACRA No. 12 of 2021 (Nyamweya, Lesiit & Odunga, JJA), declared the sentence of life imprisonment unconstitutional; and in Evans Nyamari Ayako vs. Republic Kisumu CACRA No. 22 of 2018 (Okwengu, Omondi & J. Ngugi, JJA), it was declared that life imprisonment translated to 30 years.
6. In the instant case, there is no material to establish that the Court of Appeal has interfered with the sentence of life imprisonment, as commuted by the President. The petitioner should, therefore, benefit from the pronouncements by the Court of Appeal, in Julius Kitsao Manyeso vs. Republic Malindi CACRA No. 12 of 2021 (Nyamweya, Lesiit & Odunga, JJA) and Evans Nyamari Ayako vs. Republic Kisumu CACRA No. 22 of 2018 (Okwengu, Omondi & J. Ngugi, JJA). The sentence of life imprisonment is, therefore, hereby set aside, and it shall be substituted with a definite sentence of imprisonment, guided by Evans Nyamari Ayako vs. Republic Kisumu CACRA No. 22 of 2018 (Okwengu, Omondi & J. Ngugi, JJA).
7. From the trial court record, the petitioner was a sole robber, who accosted his victim in the evening, hit her on the back with a panga, robbed her of her mobile phone, raped her and beat her some more. The circumstances of the robbery put the victim in grave danger, for if something were to go wrong, she could have been fatally injured with the panga. Consequently, I shall sentence the petitioner, as I hereby do, to 30 years in prison. This file to be closed. Orders accordingly.
RULING DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT BUSIA ON THIS 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER 2024. W MUSYOKAJUDGEMr. Arthur Etyang, Court Assistant.Mr. Patrick Makokha Buluma, the petitioner, in person.AdvocatesMr. Onanda, instructed by the Director of Public Prosecutions, for the respondent.