[2018] KEELC 459 (KLR)
The court found that, in the interests of justice and to preserve the suit property, it was necessary to grant an interim inhibition order against LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/303 and its subdivisions (LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/3625 and LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/3626) pending the inter partes hearing of the application. The applicant...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELC 459 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Bundi Kiragu; Respondent: Benjamin Collins Mati; Respondent: Gerald Nyangi Wilson
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 10 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Interim Application for Inhibition Order Pending Hearing
- Outcome
- Interim inhibition order granted pending inter partes hearing.
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Inhibition Orders, Land Disputes, Preservation of Suit Property, Interim Relief
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bundi Kiragu
Applicant
Benjamin Collins Mati
Respondent
Gerald Nyangi Wilson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Interim Application for Inhibition Order Pending Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an interim inhibition order should be granted to preserve the suit property pending the hearing and determination of the application.
- 2 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient grounds for the issuance of an inhibition order against the suit land and its subdivisions.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, in the interests of justice and to preserve the suit property, it was necessary to grant an interim inhibition order against LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/303 and its subdivisions (LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/3625 and LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/3626) pending the inter partes hearing of the application. The applicant demonstrated a prima facie case for preservation of the property, and the court exercised its discretion under section 63(e) of the Civil Procedure Act to issue the order. The urgency was not certified, but the matter was given priority due to the risk of prejudice if the property was dealt with before the application could be fully heard.
Court Disposition
Interim inhibition order granted pending inter partes hearing.
Orders
- An interim inhibition order is issued against LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/303 and its subdivisions LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/3625 and LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/3626, inhibiting all dealings on the land until the application is heard and determined.
- Costs shall be in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
32 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA
CHUKA ELC CASE NO. 10 OF 2018
BUNDI KIRAGU............................................................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
BENJAMIN COLLINS MATI..........................................1ST RESPONDENT
GERALD NYANGI WILSON.........................................2ND RESPONDENT
RULING
1. This application has a certificate of urgency. The application is not certified urgent but will be heard on priority basis.
2. The application seeks the following orders:
1. That the instant application be certified urgent and the same be heard exparte in the first instance and exparte orders be granted in terms of prayer 2.
2. That the court be pleased to issue an inhibition order against LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/303 or its subdivisions LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/3625 and LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/3626 inhibiting all dealings on the land until the instant application is heard and determined.
3. That pending the hearing and determination of the main suit herein an inhibition order against LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/303 or its subdivisions LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/3625 and LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/3626 be issued inhibiting any subdivision, sale, transfer, mortgage pending the hearing and determination of the instant suit.
4. Cost of this application be provided for.
3. The application has the following grounds:-
a) That the applicant has been on a portion of LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/303 for a long period now.
b) That the applicant strongly believes that he has attained a title over a portion of LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/303 measuring 1. 00 acres.
c) That the applicant has made use of this acre for a long time now.
d) That to the applicant’s knowledge and information the 2nd defendant has a court order giving him 10 acres out of LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/303.
e) That the applicant is aware that other persons who claim their respective portions will be affected if the 2nd defendant excises 10 acres without putting into account that the land parcels are being occupied by other persons and their interest must be catered for.
f) That the court should intervene and order that subdivisions of LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/303 must be carried diligently so as they do not interfere with the peaceful and uninterrupted occupation and use of one acre out of LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/303.
g) That the 2nd respondent should wait until the instant suit is heard and determined so that he gets his own portion.
h) That the applicant is made to understand that the 1st and 2nd respondents have caused the subdivision of the suit and LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/3625 and LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/3626 and it is clear that the portion is measured in a manner that it affects the other persons land parcels.
i) That substantive justice of this case demands that an inhibition order be issued against land parcel LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/303 or its subdivisions to wit LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/3625 and LR; Magumoni/Mukuuni/3626.
4. The court has been informed that the applicant’s advocate, Mr. I.C. Mugo, is sick and has been hospitalized. I agree that the order of inhibition as prayed for may be necessary, inorder to preserve the suit property, on interim basis until this application is heard on 2nd April, 2019. This order will be issued in terms of section 63(e) of the Civil Procedure Act.
5. In the circumstances, prayer 2 in the application is granted on an interim basis pending interpartes hearing of this application.
6. Costs shall be in the cause.
Delivered in open Court at Chuka this 5th day of December, 2018 in the presence of:
CA: Ndegwa
Muthomi Gitari h/b I.C. Mugo for the applicant
P.M. NJOROGE
JUDGE