[2024] KEHC 14537 (KLR)
The court found that the matter was at an interlocutory stage and that the parties had raised substantive issues regarding the alleged violation of the applicant's right to property and the lawfulness of the respondent's administrative actions. The court determined that it was necessary to regularize representation,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 14537 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Burn Manufacturing USA LLC; Respondent: Kenya Revenue Authority
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kiambu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition E042 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application; Directions on Preliminary Objection and Applications
- Outcome
- Directions issued for regularization of representation, service of applications, and filing of submissions; no final orders on merits at this stage.
- Judges
- DO Chepkwony
- Legal Topics
- Right to Property, Fair Administrative Action, Customs Detention, Conservatory Orders
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Burn Manufacturing USA LLC
Applicant
Kenya Revenue Authority
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Interlocutory Application; Directions on Preliminary Objection and Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the continued detention of the applicant's containers by the respondent violates the applicant's right to property under the Constitution.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to conservatory orders for the release of the detained containers pending determination of the petition.
- 3 Whether the respondent's actions amount to unfair administrative action under the Fair Administrative Actions Act, 2015.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the matter was at an interlocutory stage and that the parties had raised substantive issues regarding the alleged violation of the applicant's right to property and the lawfulness of the respondent's administrative actions. The court determined that it was necessary to regularize representation, ensure proper service of applications, and provide both parties with an opportunity to file further affidavits and written submissions. The court directed that all pending applications and the preliminary objection be canvassed simultaneously by way of written submissions, and set timelines for compliance. The court did not make a final determination on the merits of the...
Court Disposition
Directions issued for regularization of representation, service of applications, and filing of submissions; no final orders on merits at this stage.
Orders
- The petitioner to regularise issues of representation forthwith.
- The respondent to serve the petitioner with the Notice of Motion application dated 5th November, 2024 by close of business on the date of the ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Burn Manufacturing USA LLC v Kenya Revenue Authority (Petition E042 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 14537 (KLR) (15 November 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 14537 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kiambu
Petition E042 of 2024
DO Chepkwony, J
November 15, 2024
IN THE MATTER OF: ALLEGED CONTRAVENTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS THE RIGHT TO PROPERTY UNDE THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA, 2010. AND IN THE MATTER OF: RULES 4, 10, 11, 13 AND 20 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF KENYA (SUPERVISORY JURISDICTION AND PROTECTION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS OF THE INDIVIDUAL) HIGH COURT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE RULES 2013. AND IN THE MATTER OF: SECTION 4 OF THE FAIR ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS ACT, 2015. AND IN THE MATTER OF: THE INTERPRETATION OF EAST AFRICA COMMUNITY CUSTOMS MANAGEMENT ACT (EACCMA) 2004
Between
Burn Manufacturing USA LLC
Petitioner
and
Kenya Revenue Authority
Respondent
Ruling
1. The Petitioner moved the court through the Notice of Motion application dated 24th October, 2024 seeking the following orders:-a.Spent.b.That pending the hearing and determination of this application, this Honourable Court be and is hereby pleased to issue a conservatory order temporarily staying the Respondents, either by themselves, agents, officers or employees from CONTINUED detention of containers referenced as DSFU1833181 and PCIU2840941 containing SS304 WIRE Entry No.24MKIM400770589 as a raw material.c.That pending the hearing and determination of this application interparties, this Court be pleased to order the release of the containers described as DSFU1833181 and PCIU2840941 containing SS304 WIRE Entry No.24MKIM400770589 as a raw material on the condition that the Applicant provides a bank guarantee or such undertaking of an equitable amount as the court may deem appropriate, in order to prevent further loss and to safeguard the Applicant Company from potential collapse due to diminished operational capacity.d.That pending the hearing and determination of this Petition, this Honourable Court be pleased to issue a conservatory order temporarily directing the Respondents including their agents, officers or employees from further harassing the Applicant regarding the importation of raw materials in the classification of SS304 WIRE as a raw material.e.Any other relief that this Court will be pleased to issue in the circumstances.
2. The Respondent filed a response to the said application through Notice of Preliminary Objection dated 4th November, 2024 and Replying Affidavit of Tabitha Shikanda sworn on 5th November, 2024. The Respondent also filed a Notice of Motion application dated 5th November, 2024 seeking to discharge the exparte orders issued by this court on 25th October, 2024 in respect of the application of 24th October, 2024.
3. When the matter came before court on 13th November, 2024, Mr. Oriwa Counsel for Aviation Enterprises Ltd stated that his client has been wrongly enjoined in the matter and the same should be regularized. The Petitioner’s Counsel confirmed that it could be an issue with the system as the proper parties are those in the matter being Burn Manufacturing LLC –vs- Kenya Revenue Authority. The court intervened and confirmed t Respondent’s Counsel confirmed to Mr. Oriwa that the error could be a systems one which the Deputy Registrar will be directed to engage with the IT personnel to rectify the error.
4. The Respondent’s counsel confirmed service of the application and indicated they had filed their responses as well as an application. He also indicated that he was served with the Notice of Change of Advocates It was submitted by Mr. Edgar Isutsa counsel present for the Respondent that they had been served with a Notice of Change of Advocates by M/S N. M. Muriuki & Co Advocates informing them that they had taken over the conduct of the matter from the firm of Mungai Kivuti & Co Advocates to which the Petitioner’s Counsel responded that he had not been served with the Respondent’s application or with any notice of change of advocates.
5. Having carefully listened to all counsel, this Court has read through the record and proceeded to issue directions on the disposal of the applications and Notice of Preliminary Objection as follows:-a.The Petitioner to regularise the issues of his representation forthwith.b.The Respondent to serve the Petitioner with the Notice of Motion application dated 5th November, 2024 by close of business today.c.The Petitioner is hereby granted leave of 14 days upon service of the Respondent’s application to file a further affidavit alongside written submissions.d.The Petitioner’s Notice of Motion application dated 24th October 2024, Notice of Preliminary dated 4th November 2024 and the Notice of Motion application dated 5th November, 2024 to be canvassed simultaneously by way of written submissions.e.The Respondent is equally granted leave to file and serve its written submissions within fourteen (14) days of being served with the Petitioner’s submissions.f.The matter shall be mentioned on 16th December, 2024 for parties to confirm compliance and take a date for Ruling.It is so ordered.
RULING DATED AND SIGNED AT KIAMBU THIS 15th DAY OFNOVEMBER, 2024. (UPLOADED VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL)D. O. CHEPKWONYJUDGE