BWW v PWN (Family Originating Summons E006 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 4843 (KLR) (17 April 2026) (Ruling)

BWW v PWN (Family Originating Summons E006 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 4843 (KLR) (17 April 2026) (Ruling)

The applicant failed to demonstrate specific contribution to acquisition of the properties, failed to provide evidence of investment or value, and did not establish a prima facie case or irreparable harm; the application for disclosure and injunction was therefore without merit.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 4843 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: BWW; Respondent: PWN
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Judgment Date
17 April 2026
Case Number
Family Originating Summons E006 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Family Originating Summons / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs to the defendant.
Legal Topics
Matrimonial Property, Interlocutory Injunction, Disclosure, Contribution in Marriage
Source Language
English
Family Law Matrimonial Property Interlocutory Injunction Disclosure Contribution in Marriage

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

BWW

Applicant

PWN

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Originating Summons / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to disclosure of matrimonial properties and KRA PIN
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to interlocutory injunction restraining disposal of alleged matrimonial properties
  3. 3 Whether the applicant demonstrated contribution to acquisition of properties

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to demonstrate specific contribution to acquisition of the properties, failed to provide evidence of investment or value, and did not establish a prima facie case or irreparable harm; the application for disclosure and injunction was therefore without merit.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs to the defendant.

Orders

  • Application dismissed
  • Costs awarded to the defendant