Byrne Cathal v Republic [2017] KEHC 9077 (KLR)
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 9077 (KLR)
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Court
- High Court
- Panel
- LK Kimaru
- Case number
- Criminal Appeal 82 of 2016
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- High Court
- Panel
- LK Kimaru
- Case number
- Criminal Appeal 82 of 2016
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that the order of compensation was justified given the appellant's conviction on his own plea of guilty for obtaining goods by false pretences. However, considering the appellant's circumstances, the court exercised its discretion to reduce the compensation amount from Kshs.3,970,200 to Kshs.1 million. The application for revision of sentence was otherwise dismissed, with the court affirming the appropriateness of a compensation order in such cases.
Court disposition
Application for revision of sentence dismissed except for reduction of compensation amount.
Orders
- Compensation to the complainant reduced to Kshs.1 million.
- All other aspects of the sentence remain as previously ordered.
02
Material facts
Parties
Byrne Cathal
AppellantRepublic
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Compensation Ordered (reduced): KES 1,000,000
- Original Compensation Ordered: KES 3,970,200
- Fine Imposed: KES 50,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the order of compensation imposed on the appellant was proper in light of his inability to pay.
- 02
Whether the sentence should be revised to remove or reduce the compensation order.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The appellant argued that the court should not have made the order of compensation because he did not have the money to pay the compensation amount ordered by the trial court.
- Respondent
- The respondent maintained that the order of compensation was proper and that the appellant had pleaded guilty to obtaining goods by false pretences, justifying the sentence and compensation imposed.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 313 of the Penal Code; general sentencing principles.
A court may order compensation to a complainant upon conviction for obtaining goods by false pretences.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that the order of compensation was justified given the appellant's conviction on his own plea of guilty for obtaining goods by false pretences. However, considering the appellant's circumstances, the court exercised its discretion to reduce the compensation amount from Kshs.3,970,200 to Kshs.1 million. The application for revision of sentence was otherwise dismissed, with the court affirming the appropriateness of a compensation order in such cases.
Obiter and limits
- The reasons in Nairobi High Court Criminal Appeal No.120 of 2016 Bryne Cathal –vs– Republic similarly apply in this application.
Court disposition
Application for revision of sentence dismissed except for reduction of compensation amount.
- Compensation to the complainant reduced to Kshs.1 million.
- All other aspects of the sentence remain as previously ordered.
Source and reliance status
High Court
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
High Court
Judgment
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
CRIMINAL DIVISION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.82 OF 2016
BYRNE CATHAL ………………………………….......APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC………………………………….....……RESPONDENT
RULING
The Appellant, Byrne Cathal was convicted of two (2) counts of obtaining goods by false pretences contrary to Section 313 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the two charges were that on 15th May 2012 and 22nd May 2012, the Appellant obtained goods worth Kshs.3,970,200/- from Violet Akoth Oganda by falsely pretending that he was in a position to purchase the said goods, a fact the Appellant knew to be false. The Appellant pleaded guilty to the charges. He was convicted on his own plea of guilty. He was ordered to pay compensation to the complainant the said sum of Kshs.3,970,200/-. He was further ordered to pay a fine of Kshs.50,000/- or in default he was to serve one (1) year imprisonment. The Appellant was aggrieved by the order of compensation. He was of the view that the court should not have made the order of compensation in view of the fact that he did not have the money to pay the compensation. He made an application before this court for the revision of the sentence.
This court considered this application at the same time with a similar appeal that the Appellant had filed in Nairobi High Court Criminal Appeal No.120 of 2016 Bryne Cathal –vs- Republic.The reasons in that decision shall similarly apply in this application. The Appellant’s application for revision of the sentence is hereby dismissed save that the compensation that the Appellant shall pay to the complainant shall be Kshs.1 million. It is so ordered.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2017
L. KIMARU
JUDGE
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.