Kenya Judgment

High Court · High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)

Byrne Cathal v Republic [2017] KEHC 9077 (KLR)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the order of compensation was justified given the appellant's conviction on his own plea of guilty for obtaining goods by false pretences. However, considering the appellant's circumstances, the court exercised its discretion to reduce the compensation amount from Kshs.3,970,200 to Kshs.1 million. The application for revision of sentence was otherwise dismissed, with the court affirming the appropriateness of a compensation order in such cases.

Court disposition

Application for revision of sentence dismissed except for reduction of compensation amount.

Orders

  • Compensation to the complainant reduced to Kshs.1 million.
  • All other aspects of the sentence remain as previously ordered.

02

Material facts

Parties

Byrne Cathal

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Compensation Ordered (reduced): KES 1,000,000
  • Original Compensation Ordered: KES 3,970,200
  • Fine Imposed: KES 50,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for Revision of Sentence

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The appellant argued that the court should not have made the order of compensation because he did not have the money to pay the compensation amount ordered by the trial court.
Respondent
The respondent maintained that the order of compensation was proper and that the appellant had pleaded guilty to obtaining goods by false pretences, justifying the sentence and compensation imposed.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 313 of the Penal Code; general sentencing principles.

    A court may order compensation to a complainant upon conviction for obtaining goods by false pretences.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the order of compensation was justified given the appellant's conviction on his own plea of guilty for obtaining goods by false pretences. However, considering the appellant's circumstances, the court exercised its discretion to reduce the compensation amount from Kshs.3,970,200 to Kshs.1 million. The application for revision of sentence was otherwise dismissed, with the court affirming the appropriateness of a compensation order in such cases.

Obiter and limits

  • The reasons in Nairobi High Court Criminal Appeal No.120 of 2016 Bryne Cathal –vs– Republic similarly apply in this application.

Court disposition

Application for revision of sentence dismissed except for reduction of compensation amount.

  • Compensation to the complainant reduced to Kshs.1 million.
  • All other aspects of the sentence remain as previously ordered.

Source and reliance status

High Court

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

High Court

Judgment

[2017] KEHC 9077 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

CRIMINAL DIVISION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.82 OF 2016

BYRNE CATHAL ………………………………….......APPELLANT

VERSUS

REPUBLIC………………………………….....……RESPONDENT

RULING

The Appellant, Byrne Cathal was convicted of two (2) counts of obtaining goods by false pretences contrary to Section 313 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the two charges were that on 15th May 2012 and 22nd May 2012, the Appellant obtained goods worth Kshs.3,970,200/- from Violet Akoth Oganda by falsely pretending that he was in a position to purchase the said goods, a fact the Appellant knew to be false. The Appellant pleaded guilty to the charges. He was convicted on his own plea of guilty. He was ordered to pay compensation to the complainant the said sum of Kshs.3,970,200/-. He was further ordered to pay a fine of Kshs.50,000/- or in default he was to serve one (1) year imprisonment. The Appellant was aggrieved by the order of compensation. He was of the view that the court should not have made the order of compensation in view of the fact that he did not have the money to pay the compensation. He made an application before this court for the revision of the sentence.

This court considered this application at the same time with a similar appeal that the Appellant had filed in Nairobi High Court Criminal Appeal No.120 of 2016 Bryne Cathal –vs- Republic.The reasons in that decision shall similarly apply in this application. The Appellant’s application for revision of the sentence is hereby dismissed save that the compensation that the Appellant shall pay to the complainant shall be Kshs.1 million. It is so ordered.

DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 15TH DAY OF JUNE 2017

L. KIMARU

JUDGE

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Section 313 of the Penal Code

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.