[2019] KEHC 12412 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 12412 (KLR)

The court found that the in duplum rule does not apply to the present case because the debt arises from a contract for cleaning services and not from a financial institution/customer relationship as contemplated by section 44A of the Banking Act. The court further determined that the issue of alleged overpayment is...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 12412 (KLR)
Parties
Respondent: Byron Trustkett Investments Limited; Applicant: Sport Stadia Management Board; Respondent: Standard Chartered Bank (Ruaraka Branch)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 286 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Consent
Outcome
Application for setting aside consent deferred pending audit.
Judges
F Tuiyott
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Consent, In Duplum Rule, Debt Recovery, Garnishee Proceedings
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Setting Aside Consent In Duplum Rule Debt Recovery Garnishee Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Byron Trustkett Investments Limited

Respondent

Sport Stadia Management Board

Applicant

Standard Chartered Bank (Ruaraka Branch)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Consent

  1. 1 Whether the consent entered on 15th November 2018 should be set aside.
  2. 2 Whether the in duplum rule applies to the debt in question.
  3. 3 Whether there has been overpayment by the judgment debtor.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the in duplum rule does not apply to the present case because the debt arises from a contract for cleaning services and not from a financial institution/customer relationship as contemplated by section 44A of the Banking Act. The court further determined that the issue of alleged overpayment is an accounting matter that requires an audit to establish the amounts paid and any outstanding balance. Accordingly, the court directed the parties to jointly appoint an accountant to audit the debt and report to the court, with the costs of the audit to be shared initially and a final order on costs to be made after the report is received.

Court Disposition

Application for setting aside consent deferred pending audit.

Orders

  • Parties to jointly appoint an accountant within 14 days to audit the debt and report to court on payments made and any outstanding amount.
  • If parties fail to agree on an accountant, the chairperson of ICPAK to appoint one.