[2016] KEHC 6727 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 6727 (KLR)

The court found that the Petitioner had proved, on a balance of probabilities, the matrimonial offences of cruelty, exceptional depravity, desertion, and irretrievable breakdown of the marriage as set out in section 66(2) of the Marriage Act. The evidence showed that the Respondent physically assaulted the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 6727 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: C I M; Respondent: V M N
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Divorce Cause 158 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Petition allowed; marriage dissolved; restraining order granted; no order as to costs.
Judges
LA Achode
Legal Topics
Dissolution of Marriage, Matrimonial Offences, Cruelty, Adultery, Desertion, Exceptional Depravity
Source Language
en
Family and Children Dissolution of Marriage Matrimonial Offences Cruelty Adultery Desertion Exceptional Depravity

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

C I M

Applicant

V M N

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Divorce Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Respondent committed matrimonial offences of cruelty, adultery, desertion, and exceptional depravity as alleged by the Petitioner.
  2. 2 Whether the marriage between the Petitioner and Respondent has irretrievably broken down under section 66(2) of the Marriage Act.
  3. 3 Whether the Petitioner is entitled to a decree of divorce and restraining orders against the Respondent.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Petitioner had proved, on a balance of probabilities, the matrimonial offences of cruelty, exceptional depravity, desertion, and irretrievable breakdown of the marriage as set out in section 66(2) of the Marriage Act. The evidence showed that the Respondent physically assaulted the Petitioner, stole funds meant for wedding preparations and personal use, deserted the matrimonial home for over three years, and engaged in acts of deceit and unfaithfulness. The Respondent failed to respond to the Petition or attend court, and the Petitioner’s testimony was uncontroverted. The court concluded that the marriage had irretrievably broken down and could not be salvaged,...

Court Disposition

Petition allowed; marriage dissolved; restraining order granted; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The marriage celebrated between the Petitioner and Respondent at the Registrar’s office in Nairobi on 21st December 2012 is hereby dissolved.
  • Decree nisi dissolving the said marriage is issued to be made absolute thirty (30) days from the date of this judgment.