[2012] KEHC 1048 (KLR)
The court found that the Petitioner had proved the ground of cruelty against the Respondent, based on credible and coherent testimony of repeated physical abuse, threats, and financial impropriety. The evidence did not sufficiently support the charge of adultery, and the possibility of condonation was noted. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 1048 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: C. N. J.; Respondent: N. H. M.
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 9 November 2012
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 32 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Decree nisi for divorce granted on the ground of cruelty. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- EM Muriithi
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Matrimonial Cruelty, Adultery, Matrimonial Property, Decree Nisi
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C. N. J.
Applicant
N. H. M.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent was guilty of cruelty towards the Petitioner sufficient to warrant dissolution of marriage.
- 2 Whether the Petitioner had condoned acts of adultery by the Respondent, thereby precluding divorce on that ground.
- 3 Whether the statutory waiting period before decree absolute can be waived.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Petitioner had proved the ground of cruelty against the Respondent, based on credible and coherent testimony of repeated physical abuse, threats, and financial impropriety. The evidence did not sufficiently support the charge of adultery, and the possibility of condonation was noted. The statutory requirement for a six-month waiting period before making the decree nisi absolute was upheld, as no justification was provided for its waiver. The court granted a decree nisi for divorce on the ground of cruelty, with no order as to costs due to the undefended nature of the proceedings.
Court Disposition
Decree nisi for divorce granted on the ground of cruelty. No order as to costs.
Orders
- A decree nisi for divorce is granted on the ground of cruelty.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
High Court at Mombasa
Divorce Cause 32 of 2011
[if gte mso 9]><xml>
Normal 0
false false false
EN-GB X-NONE X-NONE
</xml><![endif][if gte mso 9]><![endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; line-height:115%; font-size:11. 0pt;"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-bidi-"Times New Roman";} </style> <![endif]
C. N. J. …..................................................................... PETITIONER
VERSUS
N. H. M. …............................................................... RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
(1)The Petitioner has sued her Respondent husband for divorce on the grounds of cruelty and adultery. A prayer for division of matrimonial property contained in the Petition dated 8th August 2011 was abandoned at the hearing which proceeded as as undefended cause following failure of the Respondent to enter appearance and defend the suit. The parties married on 30th June 2004 at the Registrar of Marriages, Mombasa.
(2)In adducing evidence before the court, the Petitioner testified that:
“Since the marriage, we were staying at D[....], South Coast. I have filed for dissolution for the marriage. I have based it on cruelty and adultery. After we married, my husband continued to be a drunkard and could not provide for us. When I asked for provisions he would beat me. He could not keep a job and he used to take my ATM and withdraw money. I reported him to Diani Police Station but I could not get help because he was an ex-policeman. I reported the matter to his family members but they could not help because he used to beat them. He used to beat me and abuse me in front of the children. He threatened me that he would one day kill me and I fear to live with him in the same house.
On several occasions, I caught him sleeping with women in the house. One day, I found our house-girl crying and she said she had been forced to sleep with him. She ran away when I asked her to report the matter to the police. We had a bar at U[....] and he used to live in the lodgings without coming home. When I asked him, he said that I should go back as married women stay in the house and do not go looking for their husbands. I have not condoned any of these acts.”
(3)Having observed the Petitioner testing before the court, I formed an opinion that she was telling the truth taking into account her confident demeanour and coherent presentation I however do not find that sufficient evidence was presented to support the charge of adultery. Moreover, if indeed the Respondent had been “caught on several occasions sleeping with women in the house”, the Petitioner may have condoned the repeated acts of adultery, if she continued conjugal cohabitation. See section 10 of the Matrimonial Causes Act. From the evidence, it was the Respondent who left the matrimonial home on the 29th April 2009
As regards the charge of cruelty, I consider the Respondent's insults and beatings upon the Petitioner and the withdrawal of money from the Petitioner's ATM without her consent are all an affront to the Petitioner's dignity as a person and amount to cruelty. Moreover, the threats to kill the Petitioner would instill, understably, emotional distress and fear taking into account the Respondent's position as an ex-policeman. I therefore find the charge of cruelty proved against the Respondent.
(4)The Petitioner requested that the decree absolute do issue immediately but I have not found in her evidence any justification to waive the requirement of the 6-month period before a decree nisi for divorce is made absolute. Furthermore, I was informed by the Petitioner that there are ongoing proceedings for the maintenance of children at the Tononoka Children's Court, and the Respondent may in terms of section 15 (2) and (3) of the Matrimonial Causes Act show cause not only why the decree nisi should not be made absolute, but why it should be reversed.
(5)Accordingly, for the reasons set out above, I grant the decree nisi for divorce on the ground of cruelty. As the Petition proceeded to hearing as an undefended cause, I do not make any order as to costs.
Dated and delivered this 9th day of November 2012.
EDWARD M. MURIITHI
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Mr. Owino for Bosire for the Petitioner
No appearance for the Respondent
Linda Court Clerk