[2015] KEHC 7804 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner had established the grounds of cruelty and adultery on a balance of probability, as her testimony and particulars were uncontroverted by the respondent, who failed to appear or file any response. The court accepted the petitioner's direct evidence of adultery and the outlined acts...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 7804 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: C W W; Respondent: G M N
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 116 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition allowed; marriage dissolved on grounds of cruelty and adultery; custody of children granted to petitioner; costs awarded to petitioner.
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Custody of Children, Grounds for Divorce, Adultery, Cruelty
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C W W
Applicant
G M N
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage between the petitioner and respondent has irretrievably broken down.
- 2 Whether the grounds of cruelty and adultery have been established to warrant dissolution of the marriage.
- 3 Who should have custody of the children of the marriage.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner had established the grounds of cruelty and adultery on a balance of probability, as her testimony and particulars were uncontroverted by the respondent, who failed to appear or file any response. The court accepted the petitioner's direct evidence of adultery and the outlined acts of cruelty, and determined that the marriage had irretrievably broken down with no chance of reconciliation. The court therefore dissolved the marriage, granted custody of the children to the petitioner, and awarded her the costs of the suit.
Court Disposition
Petition allowed; marriage dissolved on grounds of cruelty and adultery; custody of children granted to petitioner; costs awarded to petitioner.
Orders
- The marriage between the petitioner and respondent solemnized on 12th November 2004 is dissolved on the grounds of cruelty and adultery.
- A decree nisi shall issue forthwith and shall become absolute after sixty (60) days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI LAW COURTS
FAMILY DIVISION
DIVORCE CAUSE NO.116 OF 2009
C W W....................PETITIONER
VERSUS
G M N....................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
The Petitioner and the Respondent, both Kenyan citizens got married under the now repealed Marriage Act (Cap 150) at a ceremony conducted at the Registrar of Marriages Office in Nairobi on 12th November 2004.
The petitioner is an employee of [particulars withheld] while the respondent is self- employed. After the celebration of the marriage, the couple cohabited at [particulars withheld] in Nairobi and got two issues to the marriage D W M & E K M 9 and 7 years respectively.
The petitioner filed this petition dated 28th July 2009 seeking the dissolution of the marriage on the grounds of cruelty and adultery. She listed the particulars of cruelty as follows; that since the celebration of their marriage, the Respondent overindulged in alcohol and was away from home on many occasions thus causing the petitioner mental torture. The Respondent despite having an income has failed to provide for the daily needs of his family thus leaving the entire burden on the Petitioner.
On 14th July 2009, the Petitioner caught the Respondent with unknown woman in a neighbour's house. She further stated that the marriage has irretrievably broken down and that efforts to reconcile them have been futile.
The Petitioner prayed that the marriage be dissolved, costs of the petition be borne by the Respondent, custody of the children be granted to her with the Respondent allowed limited access and any other orders the court deems fit to grant.
The Respondent, despite being served with the petition, did not enter appearance nor file an answer to the petition. The Registrar issued certificate for the matter to proceed as undefended cause. The petitioner in her oral testimony reiterated what was stated in her petition. She further stated that she lives in the matrimonial home with the children and does not know where the Respondent lives since 2009.
The Marriage Act is now repealed and the relevant statute that deals with grounds of divorce is Section 66 of the Marriage Act 2014. Cruelty and adultery as some of the grounds that warrant divorce between the parties. A K V A W K 2000 eKLRthe Court stated that; ‘’ cruelty maybe proved by a preponderance of probability. The Court ought to be satisfied as to feel sure that the cruelty was has been established.’’ The particulars of cruelty outlined by the Petitioner in the Petition and testimony in the absence of any other evidence to controvert it, is to the Court proof of the Petitioner’s claim on a balance of probability.
In the case of N vs N 2008 1KLR 17the Court stated; ‘’that adultery can be proved without evidence of the same. Circumstantial evidence can prove adultery provided the circumstances are relevant, cogent and compelling’’. In the instant case, the Petitioner had direct evidence of the Respondent’s adulterous conduct. The respondent did not tender any evidence for the Court to consider.
The Petitioner and Respondent separated in 2009, the Respondent left the matrimonial home and she remained with the children of the marriage and lives in the matrimonial home to date. The Petitioner does not know the Respondent’s whereabouts. There is clearly no chance of reconciliation or salvage of the marriage.
FINAL ORDERS
The Court finds that the marriage between the Petitioner and Respondent has irretrievably broken down and orders as follows;
The marriage between the Petitioner and Respondent solemnized on 12th November 2004 is dissolved on the grounds of cruelty and adultery.
A decree nisi shall issue forthwith and shall become absolute after sixty (60) days.
The Petitioner shall have legal and physical custody of the children of the marriage. Further orders shall be upon application by either party
The petitioner shall have the costs of the suit.
DATED DELIVERED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT NAIROBI THIS 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015
M.W.MUIGAI
JUDGE
In the presence of;
Mr. Kamenju holding brief for Mr. Gatumuta for the Applicants