[2017] KEHC 8432 (KLR)
The court found that the marriage had irretrievably broken down, as evidenced by the uncontroverted testimony of the petitioner regarding cruelty, assault, and neglect by the respondent. The parties had been living apart since 2014, and the respondent failed to appear or contest the petition. The court was satisfied...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 8432 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: C W W; Respondent: S M M
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 63 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition allowed; marriage dissolved; decree nisi to issue; custody and maintenance issues referred to Children’s Court; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Dissolution of Marriage, Child Custody, Child Maintenance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C W W
Petitioner
S M M
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the marriage between the petitioner and respondent has irretrievably broken down.
- 2 Whether the respondent was cruel to the petitioner and failed to provide for the family.
- 3 Whether the petitioner is entitled to custody of the children.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the marriage had irretrievably broken down, as evidenced by the uncontroverted testimony of the petitioner regarding cruelty, assault, and neglect by the respondent. The parties had been living apart since 2014, and the respondent failed to appear or contest the petition. The court was satisfied that the grounds for dissolution were established and granted the orders sought, except for the prayer for injunction, which was neither pleaded nor supported by evidence. Issues of child custody and maintenance were referred to the Children’s Court for determination.
Court Disposition
Petition allowed; marriage dissolved; decree nisi to issue; custody and maintenance issues referred to Children’s Court; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The marriage between the petitioner and respondent is dissolved.
- Decree nisi to issue forthwith, to be made absolute after thirty days.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
FAMILY DIVISION
DIVORCE CAUSE NO. 63 OF 2014
C W W................................................................PETITIONER
VERSUS
S M M.............................................................RESPONDENT
JUDGEMENT
1. Marriage was celebrated between the parties herein on 24th November 2000 at the Registrar’s Office at Nairobi. A certificate of marriage, serial number [particulars withheld], was duly issued under the Marriage Act, Cap 150, Laws of Kenya (now repealed). The couple cohabited at Nairobi and Kiambu as husband and wife. They were blessed with issue, three children – N W M (born on 19th April 2003), J M M (born on 16th February 2007) and M W M (26th February 2012).
2. The petition herein was filed on 19th March 2014. It seeks dissolution of the marriage. The petitioner accuses the respondent of cruelty. He is said to have assaulted her on 3rd March at their residence in Ndenderu. He is also accused of neglecting to provide for the needs of the children and the petitioner. She pleads that the marriage has irretrievably broken down.
3. There is also pleading about the children of the marriage. The petitioner states that she has been caring for the children without support from the respondent. It is on those grounds that she would like custody of the children granted to her.
4. The petition was served as evidenced by the affidavit of service on record sworn by Justus Mutava on 8th April 2014. He never appeared nor filed answer or cross-petition. The cause was subsequently cleared and certified by the Deputy Registrar on 13th May 2016 to proceed as undefended.
5. The matter was heard on 10th October 2016. The petitioner testified. In her testimony she gave vent to the allegations made in her petition. As the cause was undefended the petitioner’s testimony was not controverted.
6. From the material placed before me it is plain that the marital relationship between the petitioner and the respondent has totally broken down. I have noted from the testimony of the petitioner that the parties have been living apart since 2014.
7. In the circumstances, I am moved to make the following final orders:-
a. That I allow the petition herein dated 19th March 2014 and decree that the marriage between the petitioner and the respondent, celebrated on 24th November 2000, is hereby dissolved;
b. That decree nisi shall issue forthwith, to be made absolute after thirty (30) days;
c. That as it was not pleaded nor any evidence led on the prayer for injunction, I shall not grant the same;
d. That all issues relating to custody and maintenance of the children of marriage to be placed before the Children’s Court; and
e. That there shall be no order as to costs.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2017.
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE