[2020] KECA 163 (KLR)
The Court found that the applicants had satisfied both prerequisites for the grant of stay of execution under rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules. First, the pending appeal was found to be arguable, even if it might not ultimately succeed. Second, the threatened action of civil jail for contempt of court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KECA 163 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Health; Applicant: Principal Secretary, Ministry of Health; Applicant: Hon. Attorney General; Respondent: Dr. Hezekiah Chepkwony
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Appeal (Application) 107 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- RN Nambuye, GG Okwengu, A Mohammed
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Contempt of Court, Interlocutory Applications, Appeals Process
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Health
Applicant
Principal Secretary, Ministry of Health
Applicant
Hon. Attorney General
Applicant
Dr. Hezekiah Chepkwony
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal under rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules.
- 2 Whether the threatened civil jail for contempt of court orders constitutes an irreversible action justifying stay.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the applicants had satisfied both prerequisites for the grant of stay of execution under rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules. First, the pending appeal was found to be arguable, even if it might not ultimately succeed. Second, the threatened action of civil jail for contempt of court orders was deemed irreversible, and thus, if executed, would render the appeal nugatory. Consequently, the Court allowed the application for stay of execution and stay of further proceedings pending the determination of the appeal.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The application dated 16th July, 2020 is allowed as prayed for in prayers (b) and (c) of the application.
- Costs of the application to abide the outcome of the Appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
41 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL
AT NAIROBI
(CORAM: NAMBUYE, OKWENGU, J. MOHAMMED JJ.A.)
CIVIL APPEAL (APPLICATION) NO. 107 OF 2020
BETWEEN
CABINET SECRETARY,
MINISTRY OF HEALTH..................................................................1STAPPLICANT
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
MINISTRY OF HEALTH................................................................2NDAPPLICANT
HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL......................................................3RDAPPLICANT
AND
DR. HEZEKIAH CHEPKWONY................................................1STRESPONDENT
(Being an application seeking stay of execution of the Ruling and orders of the Employment and Labour Relations Court of Kenya (Hon. Onesmus Makau, J.) dated 9thJuly, 2020
in
Nairobi ELRC Petition No. 124 of 2019)
*********************
RULING OF THE COURT
1. UPONperusing the Notice of Motion dated 16th July 2020 seeking an interim order staying execution of the decision and orders of the Employment and Labour Relations Court delivered by Hon. Mr. Justice Onesmus Makau on 9th July, 2020; in Nairobi Petition No. 124 of 2019 Dr. Hezekiah Chepkwony & 2 Others vs. CS Ministry of Health & 2 Otherspending hearing and determination of the appeal; an order staying further proceedings in Nairobi Petition No. 124 of 2019 Dr. Hezekiah Chepkwony & 2 Others vs CS Ministry of Health & 2 Others; pending the hearing and determination of the appeal; an order that costs of the application be in the cause among other prayers; and
2. UPONreading the grounds on the body of the application, a supporting affidavit of Mutai Kagwe together with annexures thereto; and
3. UPONreading the 1st and 2nd respondents Replying Affidavit sworn byDr. Pius Wanjala; together with annexures thereto; and
4. UPONappraising the 1st and 2nd Respondents written submissions dated 18th August 2020 together with legal authorities, relied upon in support of their opposition to the application; and
5. HAVINGconsidered the totality of the above on 28th September 2020 when the application came before us for hearing and granted an interim order of stay of execution of the decision and orders of the Employment and Labour Relations Court delivered by Hon. Mr. Justice Onesmus Makau on 9th July, 2020inNairobi Petition No. 124 of 2019as prayed for inprayer (b) of the application pending delivery of ruling on 20th November, 2020; an Interim order of stay of proceedings in Petition No. 124 of 2019 as prayed for in prayer (c) of the application pending delivery of the ruling on 20th November, 2020; and that costs of the application to abide the outcome of the ruling; and
6. HAVINGconsidered the totality of the above in light of the principles that guide this court in determining applications under rule 5(2)(b) of this Court’s Rules as summarized in Stanley Kangethe vs. Tony Ketter & Others [2013] eKLR, and which we fully adopt; and
7. HAVINGapplied the threshold therein to the rival positions herein with regard to demonstration of satisfaction of the first prerequisite under the above rule in light of the content of the Memorandum of Appeal contained in the record of appeal on which the application under consideration has been anchored, we are satisfied that the appeal pending is arguable notwithstanding that it may not ultimately succeed; and
8. HAVINGapplied the same threshold with regard to the demonstration of satisfaction of the second prerequisite of the twin principle, we are satisfied that this prerequisite has also been satisfied, reason being that action threatened against the Applicants is Civil Jail for alleged contempt of Court orders which in our view once executed is irreversible; and
9. HAVINGreached the above conclusion, we make orders as follows;
(i) The application dated 16thJuly, 2020 is allowed as prayed for in prayers (b) and (c) of the application.
(ii) Costs of the application to abide the outcome of the Appeal.
Dated and Delivered at Nairobi this 20thday of November, 2020.
R. N. NAMBUYE
.................................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
HANNAH OKWENGU
......................................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
J. MOHAMMED
........................................................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
Signed
DEPUTY REGISTRAR