[2020] KECA 163 (KLR)

[2020] KECA 163 (KLR)

The Court found that the applicants had satisfied both prerequisites for the grant of stay of execution under rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules. First, the pending appeal was found to be arguable, even if it might not ultimately succeed. Second, the threatened action of civil jail for contempt of court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KECA 163 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Health; Applicant: Principal Secretary, Ministry of Health; Applicant: Hon. Attorney General; Respondent: Dr. Hezekiah Chepkwony
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal (Application) 107 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
RN Nambuye, GG Okwengu, A Mohammed
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Contempt of Court, Interlocutory Applications, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Employment and Labour Stay of Execution Contempt of Court Interlocutory Applications Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of Health

Applicant

Principal Secretary, Ministry of Health

Applicant

Hon. Attorney General

Applicant

Dr. Hezekiah Chepkwony

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal under rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the threatened civil jail for contempt of court orders constitutes an irreversible action justifying stay.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the applicants had satisfied both prerequisites for the grant of stay of execution under rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules. First, the pending appeal was found to be arguable, even if it might not ultimately succeed. Second, the threatened action of civil jail for contempt of court orders was deemed irreversible, and thus, if executed, would render the appeal nugatory. Consequently, the Court allowed the application for stay of execution and stay of further proceedings pending the determination of the appeal.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The application dated 16th July, 2020 is allowed as prayed for in prayers (b) and (c) of the application.
  • Costs of the application to abide the outcome of the Appeal.