[2023] KEELC 22203 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 22203 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to comply with its directions to file written submissions and an affidavit of service. As a result, the court could not ascertain whether the respondent had been served or given an opportunity to respond. No alternative method of disposal was provided, and the applicant's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 22203 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Cabro Mombasa Limted; Defendant: Rafiki Microfinance Bank Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 28 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
application dismissed for non-compliance with court orders
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Injunctive Relief, Non Prosecution, Compliance With Court Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Injunctive Relief Non Prosecution Compliance With Court Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cabro Mombasa Limted

Plaintiff

Rafiki Microfinance Bank Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to interlocutory injunctive relief pending hearing and determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether failure to file submissions and affidavit of service amounts to non-prosecution warranting dismissal of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to comply with its directions to file written submissions and an affidavit of service. As a result, the court could not ascertain whether the respondent had been served or given an opportunity to respond. No alternative method of disposal was provided, and the applicant's non-compliance meant the application remained unprosecuted. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for non-compliance with court orders, emphasizing the importance of adhering to procedural requirements and timely prosecution of applications.

Court Disposition

application dismissed for non-compliance with court orders

Orders

  • The application dated 29th September, 2023 is dismissed for non-compliance with court orders.
  • There shall be no orders as to costs.