[2017] KEELC 3371 (KLR)
The court held that since the Magistrate’s Court had already delivered judgment on 12th September, 2014 and issued a decree, and there was no evidence that the judgment or decree had been set aside, there was no pending suit capable of being transferred to the Environment and Land Court. The court further reasoned...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 3371 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Caleb Jomo Ong’uti; Respondent: Martin Khaemba
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application 102 of 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Suit
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs
- Judges
- OA Angote
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Suit, Jurisdiction of Magistrate Courts, Land Ownership Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Caleb Jomo Ong’uti
Applicant
Martin Khaemba
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Suit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Environment and Land Court has jurisdiction to transfer a concluded suit from the Magistrate’s Court.
- 2 Whether there is a pending suit capable of being transferred to the Environment and Land Court.
- 3 Whether the Magistrate’s Court had jurisdiction to determine the land dispute.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that since the Magistrate’s Court had already delivered judgment on 12th September, 2014 and issued a decree, and there was no evidence that the judgment or decree had been set aside, there was no pending suit capable of being transferred to the Environment and Land Court. The court further reasoned that if the Magistrate’s Court lacked jurisdiction, it was incumbent upon that court to set aside its judgment to allow for a fresh suit or transfer. In the absence of such an order, the application for transfer was unmeritorious and was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application dated 27th April, 2016 is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT MACHAKOS
MISC. CIVIL APPL. NO. 102 OF 2016
CALEB JOMO ONG’UTI ………………………………………….APPLICANT
VERSUS
MARTIN KHAEMBA ………………………………………...….RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Notice of Motion before me is the one dated 27th April, 2016. In the Application, the Plaintiff is seeking for the following orders:
a. That the suit herein be transferred to the Environment and Land Court at Machakos for hearing and determination.
b. That the costs of this Application be costs in the cause.
2. The Application is premised on the grounds that the matter in dispute involves a property known as plot number 38 that was hived from L.R. NO. 7340/79; that this matter was initially filed at the Chief Magistrate’s Court Machakos because it started off as a civil suit and that it later emerged that the issues in the suit were in respect to a land dispute.
3. In his Replying Affidavit, the Respondent deponed that having delivered its Judgment, the lower court is functus officioand that there is a pending suit in HCCC. No. 14 of 2011 where ownership of the suit property is the subject matter.
4. The Plaintiff’s advocate filed submissions which I have considered.
5. It is not in dispute that the Plaintiff herein sued the Defendant in Machakos SPMCC NO. 282 of 2012 in which he sought for a declaration that he is the legal owner of the suit property. The Plaintiff also prayed for an order that the Defendant to demolish structures and buildings erected on the suit property.
6. On 12th September, 2014, Hon. Kahuya delivered her Judgment and allowed the Plaintiffs’ prayers. Indeed, a decree was issued on 22nd September, 2014 thus bringing the dispute to an end.
7. The Defendant subsequently filed an Application dated 26th March, 2015 in which he sought for a stay of the Judgment on the ground that the Magistrate acted in excess of jurisdiction.
8. I have gone through the annextures and I have not seen the Ruling of the Honourable Magistrate in respect to the Application dated 26th March, 2015.
9. In the absence of evidence showing that the Judgment of 12th September, 2014 and the subsequent decree was set aside by the Magistrate, there is no pending suit that can be transferred to this court. Indeed, the Plaintiff is at liberty to enforce the said Judgment.
10. If the Honourable Magistrate finds that he did not have jurisdiction in the first place, then he has to set aside the entire Judgment to enable the Plaintiff to either file a fresh suit in this court or to seek for the transfer of the file.
11. In the absence of an order setting aside the Judgment of 12th September, 2014, I find that the Application dated 27th April, 2016 is unmeritorious and I dismiss it with costs.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT MACHAKOS THIS 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2017.
OSCAR A. ANGOTE
JUDGE