[2019] KEELRC 571 (KLR)

[2019] KEELRC 571 (KLR)

The court found that the claimant was employed by the respondent for approximately four years and was summarily dismissed without notice, reason, or a hearing, in violation of Sections 36, 41, 43, and 45 of the Employment Act, 2007. The respondent failed to provide any justification or follow due process. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEELRC 571 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Calister Onyango Juma; Respondent: Gumi Steel Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 358 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Claim / Judgment
Outcome
judgment_for_claimant
Judges
MN Nduma
Legal Topics
Unfair Dismissal, Summary Dismissal, Terminal Benefits, Notice Pay, Annual Leave, Compensation for Loss of Employment
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Unfair Dismissal Summary Dismissal Terminal Benefits Notice Pay Annual Leave Compensation for Loss of Employment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Calister Onyango Juma

Claimant

Gumi Steel Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unlawfully and unfairly dismissed from employment.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation for unfair dismissal and terminal benefits including notice pay and unpaid leave.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent violated the Employment Act, 2007 in the manner of dismissal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimant was employed by the respondent for approximately four years and was summarily dismissed without notice, reason, or a hearing, in violation of Sections 36, 41, 43, and 45 of the Employment Act, 2007. The respondent failed to provide any justification or follow due process. The claimant did not contribute to the dismissal and was not paid any terminal benefits. The court held that the dismissal was unlawful and unfair, entitling the claimant to compensation for unfair dismissal, notice pay, and payment in lieu of accrued leave. The court awarded four months' salary as compensation, one month salary in lieu of notice, and payment for three years of untaken...

Court Disposition

judgment_for_claimant

Orders

  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs. 46,000 as compensation for unlawful dismissal.
  • The respondent shall pay the claimant Kshs. 11,500 as one month salary in lieu of notice.