[2025] KEHC 490 (KLR)
The court found that, guided by Article 159(2)(c) of the Constitution, the dispute between the parties is amenable to alternative dispute resolution, specifically mediation. While the applicant sought orders for deposit of the admitted sum and judgment on admission, the court noted that the respondents expressed...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 490 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Camusat Kenya Ltd; Respondent: Wananchi Group (Kenya) Limited; Respondent: Wananchi Telecom Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Commercial Case E594 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Deposit and Judgment on Admission
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; parties referred to court-annexed mediation; each party to bear own costs.
- Judges
- JWW Mong'are
- Legal Topics
- Interlocutory Applications, Judgment on Admission, Security for Debt, Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Camusat Kenya Ltd
Applicant
Wananchi Group (Kenya) Limited
Respondent
Wananchi Telecom Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Deposit and Judgment on Admission
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should order the defendants to deposit Kshs. 105,835,237.57 in an interest earning account pending determination of the suit.
- 2 Whether judgment should be entered for the applicant on admission by the defendants.
- 3 Whether the dispute should be referred to alternative dispute resolution mechanisms.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, guided by Article 159(2)(c) of the Constitution, the dispute between the parties is amenable to alternative dispute resolution, specifically mediation. While the applicant sought orders for deposit of the admitted sum and judgment on admission, the court noted that the respondents expressed willingness to reconcile accounts and resolve the matter amicably. The court exercised its discretion to refer the parties to court-annexed mediation for expeditious resolution, rather than granting the substantive orders sought at this interlocutory stage. The application for deposit and judgment on admission was not granted, and each party was ordered to bear its own costs.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; parties referred to court-annexed mediation; each party to bear own costs.
Orders
- Parties to submit to court-annexed mediation for expeditious resolution of the dispute.
- Matter to be mentioned before the Deputy Registrar to schedule mediation on 17th February 2025.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Camusat Kenya Ltd v Wananchi Group (Kenya) Limited & another (Commercial Case E594 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 490 (KLR) (Commercial and Tax) (23 January 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 490 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Commercial and Tax
Commercial Case E594 of 2024
JWW Mong'are, J
January 23, 2025
Between
Camusat Kenya Ltd
Applicant
and
Wananchi Group (Kenya) Limited
1st Respondent
Wananchi Telecom Ltd
2nd Respondent
Ruling
1. The Plaintiff has by an application dated 1/10/2024 moved this Honourable Court pursuant to Articles 48 and 159 of the constitution and Section 1A, 1B, 3, 3A of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 13,36,40,51 of the Civil Procedure Rules seeking the following Orders:-1. spent2. spent3. That the Honourable Court be pleased and does hereby order the defendant to deposit the sum of Kshs. 105,835,237. 57/= (One hundred and five million, eight hundred thirty-five thousand two hundred thirty-seven shillings) only in an interest earning account in the names of the advocates on record pending the hearing and determination of the instant suit.4. That the Honourable Court be pleased and does hereby issue judgement in favour of the Plaintiff/ Applicant as against the Defendant/Respondent on their own admission5. That the Honourable Court be pleased and does hereby grant any other order that the court may deem fit.6. Costs of this Application be provided for.
2. The application is supported by the grounds set on its face and the supporting affidavit of Gideon Chepkwony. The Application is opposed and the Defendants have filed a replying affidavit worn on 8/10/2024 by Caroline Julio.
3. It is the Applicant’s case that the Defendant Company is in the process of being sold to an undisclosed 3rd party outside the jurisdiction of this court and yet the Defendants acknowledge being indebted to the plaintiff to the tune of Kshs. 105,835,237. 57/=. The Applicants seeks to have the said funds held in an interest earning account in the joint names of advocates for both parties pending determination of the said suit. A second prayer for entry of judgment on admission has also been sought.
4. In opposing the present application, the Defendants filed a replying affidavit sworn by Caroline Julio on 8th October 2024. Ostensibly I note that the Defendants intimate and have stated that they are ready and willing to hold discussions on the outstanding accounts with a view to reconciling the present debt and that the application and the present suit denies them the opportunity to conclusively do so.
5. Article 159 () (d) of the Constitution has urged the court to promote alternative Dispute Resolution in is exercise of judicial authority. The said article provides as follows:-“(2)2) In exercising judicial authority, the courts and tribunals shall be guided by the following principles—(a)……………………………………………;(b………………………………………….;(c)alternative forms of dispute resolution including reconciliation, mediation, arbitration and traditional dispute resolution mechanisms shall be promoted, subject to clause (3);”(d)………………………………………….
6. Guided by the above constitutional underpinnings, I am satisfied that this is a matter that parties can resolve conclusively through Alternative Dispute Resolution and order that the parties do submit themselves to Court Annexed Mediation for expeditious resolution of the present dispute. Subsequently, this matter shall be mentioned before the Deputy Registrar to schedule a mediation on 17th February 2025. Should the parties fail to mutually reach an agreement to settle the matter through mediation, then the suit as filed shall proceed for full trial and determination on merit. Each party shall bear their own costs of the present application. It is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY at NAIROBI this 23rd DAY OF JANUARY 2025J.W.W. MONG’AREJUDGEIn the Presence of:Ms. Mwikali holding brief for Mr. Omwanza for the Plaintiffs/Applicants.Mr. Wesonga for the Defendant/Respondents.Amos - Court Assistant