[2023] KEHC 18302 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 18302 (KLR)

The court found that the issue of public participation is central to the petition challenging the constitutionality of Section 31 of the Finance Bill, 2018. The absence of the 3rd Respondent's Replying Affidavit, which purportedly addresses the public participation process, is a critical evidentiary gap. To ensure a...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 18302 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Candy Kenya Ltd; Applicant: Kenafric Industries Ltd; Applicant: Kenya Sweets Ltd; Applicant: Patco Industries Ltd; Applicant: Mzuri Sweets Ltd; Applicant: Veeral Shah Super Sweets Ltd; Applicant: Rok Industries Ltd; Applicant: Sweets ‘R’ Us Ltd; Respondent: Attorney General; Respondent: Cabinet Secretary National Treasury; Respondent: National Assembly; Respondent: Kenya Revenue Authority
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Constitutional Petition 231 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Pre Judgment Directions/order
Outcome
Further directions issued; matter not determined on merits.
Judges
AC Mrima
Legal Topics
Public Participation, Legislative Process, Finance Bill, Constitutional Validity
Source Language
en
Constitutional Law Public Participation Legislative Process Finance Bill Constitutional Validity

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Candy Kenya Ltd

Applicant

Kenafric Industries Ltd

Applicant

Kenya Sweets Ltd

Applicant

Patco Industries Ltd

Applicant

Mzuri Sweets Ltd

Applicant

Veeral Shah Super Sweets Ltd

Applicant

Rok Industries Ltd

Applicant

Sweets ‘R’ Us Ltd

Applicant

Attorney General

Respondent

Cabinet Secretary National Treasury

Respondent

National Assembly

Respondent

Kenya Revenue Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Pre Judgment Directions/order

  1. 1 Whether Section 31 of the Finance Bill, 2018 was enacted in violation of the constitutional requirement for public participation.
  2. 2 Whether the absence of the 3rd Respondent's Replying Affidavit affects the court's ability to determine the issue of public participation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the issue of public participation is central to the petition challenging the constitutionality of Section 31 of the Finance Bill, 2018. The absence of the 3rd Respondent's Replying Affidavit, which purportedly addresses the public participation process, is a critical evidentiary gap. To ensure a fair and just determination, the court ordered the National Assembly to provide the missing affidavit and its annexures, and to upload them to the Court Tracking System. The matter is to be placed before the Presiding Judge for further proceedings once the affidavit is availed.

Court Disposition

Further directions issued; matter not determined on merits.

Orders

  • The 3rd Respondent, National Assembly, shall forward a copy of the Replying Affidavit sworn by Michael Sialai on 27th July, 2018, together with annexures, to the Hon. Deputy Registrar.
  • The 3rd Respondent shall upload another set of the affidavit and annexures to the Court Tracking System (CTS).