[2023] KEELRC 2048 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 2048 (KLR)

The court found that the trial court had properly considered the appellant's application to set aside the ex-parte proceedings and was correct in concluding that the appellant was duly served with the hearing notice. The appellant failed to provide sufficient explanation for its absence at the hearing. The appellate...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 2048 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Career Directions Limited; Respondent: Jeremiah Ouko Ogungu
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Appeal E159 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed with costs
Judges
NJ Abuodha
Legal Topics
Service of Process, Ex Parte Proceedings, Setting Aside Judgment
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Service of Process Ex Parte Proceedings Setting Aside Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Career Directions Limited

Appellant

Jeremiah Ouko Ogungu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was duly served with the hearing notice for the trial court proceedings.
  2. 2 Whether the trial court erred in dismissing the appellant's application to set aside ex-parte proceedings.
  3. 3 Whether the trial court failed to consider the appellant's evidence and submissions.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the trial court had properly considered the appellant's application to set aside the ex-parte proceedings and was correct in concluding that the appellant was duly served with the hearing notice. The appellant failed to provide sufficient explanation for its absence at the hearing. The appellate court agreed with the trial court's analysis of the documents and explanations provided, holding that there was no error in the trial court's decision. Consequently, the appeal lacked merit and was dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent.