[2021] KEELRC 1912 (KLR)

[2021] KEELRC 1912 (KLR)

The court found that although the application for substitution was filed outside the one-year period prescribed by the Civil Procedure Rules, the delay was satisfactorily explained by the time taken to obtain letters of administration, a process outside the applicants' control. The court exercised its discretion...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELRC 1912 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Carey Francis Onyango; Respondent: Maseno University; Applicant: Elizabeth Opiyo Awino Rapemo; Applicant: Florence Akeyo Awino
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 205 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Revival and Substitution After Claimant's Death
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Revival of Suit, Substitution of Parties, Extension of Time, Letters of Administration
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Civil Procedure Revival of Suit Substitution of Parties Extension of Time Letters of Administration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Carey Francis Onyango

Claimant

Maseno University

Respondent

Elizabeth Opiyo Awino Rapemo

Applicant

Florence Akeyo Awino

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Revival and Substitution After Claimant's Death

  1. 1 Whether the court should revive the claimant's cause after abatement due to death.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants should be granted leave to substitute the deceased claimant.
  3. 3 Whether the time for substitution should be enlarged beyond the statutory period.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that although the application for substitution was filed outside the one-year period prescribed by the Civil Procedure Rules, the delay was satisfactorily explained by the time taken to obtain letters of administration, a process outside the applicants' control. The court exercised its discretion under Order 24 Rule 2 to revive the suit and allow substitution, holding that justice would be best served by enabling the matter to proceed on its merits. The court directed the applicants to file and serve an amended statement of claim within 21 days.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The motion dated 21 January 2019 is allowed.
  • The applicants are directed to file and serve an amended statement of claim within the next 21 days.