[2018] KEELC 128 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 128 (KLR)

The court found that the refusal by the outgoing advocate to grant consent for the change of advocate for the second plaintiff was unreasonable, as the proper avenue for safeguarding the advocate's interest in costs is through taxation in a miscellaneous application, not by withholding consent. The court also held...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 128 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Caroline Wanyua Mwendwa; Plaintiff: Alphonce Mwendwa Nyalita; Defendant: China Road and Bridge Corporation (Kenya)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Makueni
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 146 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Application for Leave to Change Advocate After Judgment
Outcome
Application allowed.
Legal Topics
Change of Advocate, Leave of Court, Advocate Client Costs, Decretal Sum Deposit
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Change of Advocate Leave of Court Advocate Client Costs Decretal Sum Deposit

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Caroline Wanyua Mwendwa

Plaintiff

Alphonce Mwendwa Nyalita

Plaintiff

China Road and Bridge Corporation (Kenya)

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Application for Leave to Change Advocate After Judgment

  1. 1 Whether leave should be granted to the firm of Ngeresa & Okallo Associates to come on record for the second plaintiff after judgment has been entered.
  2. 2 Whether the outgoing advocate's refusal to consent to the change of advocate is reasonable.
  3. 3 Whether the interests of the outgoing advocate and the first plaintiff require the decretal sum to be deposited in court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the refusal by the outgoing advocate to grant consent for the change of advocate for the second plaintiff was unreasonable, as the proper avenue for safeguarding the advocate's interest in costs is through taxation in a miscellaneous application, not by withholding consent. The court also held that there was no basis for requiring the decretal sum to be deposited in court since execution had not commenced and the only interest to be safeguarded was that of the outgoing advocate, not the first plaintiff. Accordingly, the court granted leave for the firm of Ngeresa & Okallo Associates to come on record for the second plaintiff and awarded costs of the application to the...

Court Disposition

Application allowed.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the firm of Ngeresa & Okallo Associates to come on record for the second plaintiff in place of Prof Kiama Wangai & Co. Advocates.
  • The costs of the application are awarded to the plaintiffs/applicants.