[2016] KEHC 3076 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 3076 (KLR)

The court found that the parties had reached a consent on the distribution of Isukha/Lukose/54, and there was no dispute regarding the distribution of Isukha/Lukose/193 and 798 as proposed by the protestors. The evidence established that the deceased had made arrangements for the distribution of his estate prior to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 3076 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Catherine Alubayi Ayekha; Applicant: Gordon Witaba Ayekha; Respondent: Ernest Shimwati Ayekha; Respondent: Siepa Musiomi
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 142 of 2001
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Judgment
Outcome
Protest allowed in part; estate distributed as per court orders.
Judges
AT Sitati
Legal Topics
Distribution of Estate, Grant of Letters of Administration, Protest to Confirmation, Life Interest, Trust for Children
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Distribution of Estate Grant of Letters of Administration Protest to Confirmation Life Interest Trust for Children

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Catherine Alubayi Ayekha

Applicant

Gordon Witaba Ayekha

Applicant

Ernest Shimwati Ayekha

Respondent

Siepa Musiomi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the proposed distribution of the deceased's estate was fair and in accordance with the wishes of the deceased.
  2. 2 Whether the protestors' claim to have land parcel Isukha/Lukose/193 devolve to the family of the late Josephat Musiomi should be upheld.
  3. 3 Whether the petitioners acted improperly by registering all parcels in their names before confirmation of grant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the parties had reached a consent on the distribution of Isukha/Lukose/54, and there was no dispute regarding the distribution of Isukha/Lukose/193 and 798 as proposed by the protestors. The evidence established that the deceased had made arrangements for the distribution of his estate prior to his death, and the protestors' proposal reflected both the deceased's wishes and the interests of the beneficiaries. The court therefore ordered that Isukha/Lukose/193 be given wholly to Siepa Musiomi to hold in trust for her children with a life interest to herself, and that Isukha/Lukose/798 be shared equally between Ernest Shimwati Ayekha and Gordon Witaba Ayekha. The court...

Court Disposition

Protest allowed in part; estate distributed as per court orders.

Orders

  • Land parcel No. Isukha/Lukose/193 to Elisieba Mmbayi alias Siepa Musiomi wholly to hold in trust for her children with a life interest to herself.
  • Land parcel No. Isukha/Lukose/798 to be shared equally between Ernest Shimwati Ayekha and Gordon Witaba Ayekha.