[2018] KEHC 8813 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 8813 (KLR)

The court determined that before making a final judgment on whether the disputed parcels, L.R. Ngobit/Subuko Block 5/86 and L.R. Abogeta/L. Kithangari/263, form part of the deceased's estate or were fraudulently transferred to the objector, it is necessary to investigate the history and registration of these...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 8813 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Catherine Kaimuri Karimba; Respondent: Beatrice Mucece
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Succession Cause 508 of 2009
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Interlocutory Ruling on Objection to Confirmation of Grant
Outcome
Further inquiry ordered; no final determination on the objection at this stage.
Legal Topics
Succession of Estates, Confirmation of Grant, Fraudulent Land Transfer, Beneficiary Disputes
Source Language
en
Family and Children Land and Property Succession of Estates Confirmation of Grant Fraudulent Land Transfer Beneficiary Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Catherine Kaimuri Karimba

Applicant

Beatrice Mucece

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Succession Cause / Interlocutory Ruling on Objection to Confirmation of Grant

  1. 1 Whether L.R. Ngobit/Subuko Block 5/86 and L.R. Abogeta/L. Kithangari/263 form part of the deceased's estate.
  2. 2 Whether the registration of the disputed parcels in the objector's name was fraudulent.
  3. 3 Whether the objector is entitled to retain the disputed parcels as her property.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that before making a final judgment on whether the disputed parcels, L.R. Ngobit/Subuko Block 5/86 and L.R. Abogeta/L. Kithangari/263, form part of the deceased's estate or were fraudulently transferred to the objector, it is necessary to investigate the history and registration of these parcels. The court noted the dates of registration in the objector's name occurred after the deceased's death, raising questions about the legitimacy of the transfers. The court directed that the status of the parcels be established from the appropriate land registrars before a final determination can be made regarding their inclusion in the estate and the alleged fraud.

Court Disposition

Further inquiry ordered; no final determination on the objection at this stage.

Orders

  • Status of L.R. Ngobit/Subuko Block 5/86 and L.R. Abogeta/L. Kithangari/263 to be established from the appropriate land registrars.
  • Matter to be mentioned on 19th February 2018 for further directions.