[2022] KEELC 1014 (KLR)
The court found that the 1st respondent failed to annex or produce the alleged judgment from Eldoret HCCC No. 16 of 1998, which was the basis for the plea of res judicata. Without the judgment, there was no evidence that the issues in the current suit had been previously determined between the same parties. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEELC 1014 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Catherine Mwashi; Respondent: Kiplagat Birech; Respondent: Uasin Gishu Land Registrar; Respondent: The Honorable Attorney General
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case E020 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- preliminary objection dismissed
- Judges
- EO Obaga
- Legal Topics
- Res Judicata, Preliminary Objection, Land Dispute, Title to Land
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Catherine Mwashi
Applicant
Kiplagat Birech
Respondent
Uasin Gishu Land Registrar
Respondent
The Honorable Attorney General
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit is res judicata due to prior litigation over the same subject matter.
- 2 Whether the preliminary objection is sustainable without annexing the alleged previous judgment.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the 1st respondent failed to annex or produce the alleged judgment from Eldoret HCCC No. 16 of 1998, which was the basis for the plea of res judicata. Without the judgment, there was no evidence that the issues in the current suit had been previously determined between the same parties. The court emphasized that it is not the court's duty to search for evidence or documents that parties fail to provide, especially for matters determined decades ago. Consequently, the preliminary objection was dismissed for lack of basis.
Court Disposition
preliminary objection dismissed
Orders
- The preliminary objection is dismissed with costs to the applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT OF KENYA
AT ELDORET
ELC NO. E020 OF 2021 (O.S)
CATHERINE MWASHI.................................................................................APPLICANT
-VERSUS-
KIPLAGAT BIRECH........................................................................1ST RESPONDENT
UASIN GISHU LAND REGISTRAR..............................................2ND RESPONDENT
THE HONORABLE ATTORNEY GENERAL...............................3RD RESPONDENT
RULING:
1. This is a ruling in respect of a Preliminary objection dated 2nd August, 2021 in which the 1st Respondent contends that this suit is res judicata. The 1st Respondent contends that the Applicant and the 1st Respondent litigated over the same subject matter in Eldoret HCCC No. 16 of 1998 (Salome Mwashi & another –Vs- Javan Mwashi & another.
2. The 1st Respondent therefore argues that the issues being raised in this suit touching Ngelel Tarit farm LR 10927 measuring 14. 56 acres were determined by the High Court on 21st February, 2003.
3. The parties were directed to file written submissions in respect of the preliminary objection. The 1st Respondent filed his submissions dated 27th October, 2021. The Applicant filed her submissions dated 11th November, 2021. I have gone through the submissions with a view to determining whether this suit is res judicata or not. Though the Counsel for the 1st Respondent mentions of a judgment delivered on 21st February, 2003 in Eldoret HCCC No. 16 of 1998 being annexed to the submissions, no such judgment was annexed. The said judgment was also not annexed to the notice of preliminary objection.
4. In the absence of the said judgment, the Court is left with no option other than to dismiss the preliminary objection as having no basis. I wish to state that it is important for advocates to cross check what they file in Court because they have a duty to assist the Court in administration of justice. I do not think it will be proper for the Court to ask parties to put their house in order or to go digging out files from the Archives in matters which were determined over two decades ago. The preliminary objection is dismissed with costs.
It is so ordered.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Eldoret on this 3rd day of March, 2022.
E. OBAGA
JUDGE
In the virtual presence of;
Ms. Rutto for 3rd Defendant.
Court Assistant –Albert
E. OBAGA
JUDGE
3RD MARCH, 2022