[2020] KECA 191 (KLR)

[2020] KECA 191 (KLR)

The Court found that the applicants failed to demonstrate that the intended appeal would be rendered nugatory if stay was not granted. The orders of 14th May, 2019 reverted the suit property to the deceased, and there was no imminent risk of transfer or dissipation of the property. The applicants also failed to show...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KECA 191 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Catherine Njeri Ng'ang'a; Applicant: Beth Nyambura Kibiro; Applicant: Samuel Ciira Kimiro; Respondent: Nancy Wanjiru Njuguna
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 288 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
J Karanja, F Sichale, A Mohammed
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Succession Disputes, Confirmation of Grant, Fraudulent Transfer, Nugatory Appeal Test
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Execution Succession Disputes Confirmation of Grant Fraudulent Transfer Nugatory Appeal Test

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Catherine Njeri Ng'ang'a

Applicant

Beth Nyambura Kibiro

Applicant

Samuel Ciira Kimiro

Applicant

Nancy Wanjiru Njuguna

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution under Rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules.
  2. 2 Whether the intended appeal would be rendered nugatory if stay is not granted.
  3. 3 Whether the applicants would suffer prejudice absent a stay of execution.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the applicants failed to demonstrate that the intended appeal would be rendered nugatory if stay was not granted. The orders of 14th May, 2019 reverted the suit property to the deceased, and there was no imminent risk of transfer or dissipation of the property. The applicants also failed to show that they would suffer prejudice absent a stay. Consequently, the application for stay of execution was disallowed as the threshold for granting such orders under Rule 5(2)(b) was not met.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 1st July, 2020 is disallowed.
  • The costs of the motion shall be in the intended appeal.