[2020] KEELC 242 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had proved, on a balance of probabilities, her beneficial ownership of Plot No. W.445 in Nyumba Moja Women Group land, Dandora, Nairobi, based on the uncontroverted evidence presented. The defendant, having failed to file a defence or adduce any evidence, did not challenge the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEELC 242 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Catherine Wamuyu Mathenge; Defendant: Joseph Njoroge Thagichu
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 28 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Land and Property Suit / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the plaintiff
- Judges
- BM Eboso
- Legal Topics
- Trespass to Land, Injunctions, Vacant Possession, Nominal Damages
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Catherine Wamuyu Mathenge
Plaintiff
Joseph Njoroge Thagichu
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff is the beneficial owner of Plot No. W.445 in Nyumba Moja Women Group land in Dandora, Nairobi.
- 2 Whether the defendant trespassed on the suit property and is liable for damages.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an injunction and vacant possession of the suit property.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had proved, on a balance of probabilities, her beneficial ownership of Plot No. W.445 in Nyumba Moja Women Group land, Dandora, Nairobi, based on the uncontroverted evidence presented. The defendant, having failed to file a defence or adduce any evidence, did not challenge the plaintiff's claim of ownership or the allegations of trespass. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with the property, an order for vacant possession, and nominal damages for trespass. The claim for special damages was denied as it was not specifically pleaded. The court awarded nominal damages of Kshs...
Court Disposition
judgment for the plaintiff
Orders
- A permanent injunction restraining the defendant and his agents/servants from interfering with, trespassing upon, or dealing with Plot No. W.445 in Nyumba Moja Women Group Land in Dandora, Nairobi.
- The defendant shall give vacant possession of the property within 30 days from service of the notice of entry of judgment; in default, peaceful eviction to be effected under police supervision upon confirmation of service.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT NAIROBI
ELC CASE NO. 28 OF 2014
CATHERINE WAMUYU MATHENGE.........................PLAINTIFF
=VERSUS=
JOSEPH NJOROGE THAGICHU.............................DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
1. The plaintiff brought this suit through a plaint dated 8/1/2014. She sought the following verbatim orders against the defendant:
(a) An order of injunction restraining the defendant, his servants and/or agents from interfering with, trespassing upon, demolishing, carrying away materials or in any manner whatsoever from dealing with Plot No W 445 in Nyumba Moja Women Group land in Dandora, Nairobi.
(b) An order that the Defendant do give vacant possession of Plot No W 445 Nyumba Moja Women Group Dandora to the Plaintiff and in default thereof be evicted therefrom.
(c) Damages for trespass.
(d) Costs of this suit.
2. Her case was that she was the owner/allottee of Plot No. W.445 (the suit property) from Nyumba Moja Women’s Group within Dandora Area in Nairobi since 1995. In the month of August, 2013, she commenced development of the suit property. On 8/11/2013, the defendant who was a stranger to her went to the suit property claiming that it belonged to him. On 9/11/2013, the defendant, in the company of hired thugs and goons, descended on the suit property, demolished the plaintiff’s structures and carted away the plaintiff’s construction materials and equipment from the suit property. The defendant thereafter commenced construction on the suit property. Aggrieved, she brought this suit seeking the above orders.
3. The defendant entered appearance through the Firm of M P Mwangi & Company Advocates vide a Memorandum of Appearance dated 19/2/2014. He did not, however, file a defence. Consequently, the suit was heard as an undefended cause on 22/9/2020.
4. At the hearing, the plaintiff testified as PW1. She adopted her witness statement dated 8/1/2014 in which she stated her case as summarized above. She produced the following six (6) documents: (i) Letter of Allotment of Plot No W 445 by Nyumba Moja Women Group to the Plaintiff; (ii) Beacon Certificate for Plot No W 455 to Catherine Wamuyu Mathenge from Nairobi City Council dated 26/11/1996; (iii) Extract of the Register of members of Nyumba Moja Women Group; (iv) Letter of Allotment of Plot W 1360 to Joseph Njoroge Thagichu by Nyumba Moja Women Group; (v) Pictures/Photographs of destruction on Plot No W445 by the defendant and his workers and the materials put up on the plot by the plaintiff; and (vi) Receipts of materials purchased by the plaintiff and put on the plot. Subsequently, her advocate filed written submission dated 1/10/20 in which he reiterated the plaintiff’s case and urged the court to grant the prayers sought in the plaint.
5. I have considered the pleadings, evidence and submissions before court. This suit is undefended. There is no evidence relating to the survey and registration status of the suit property. In the absence of any defence and/or controverting evidence, the court is satisfied that the plaintiff has proved her case on a balance of probabilities in so far as beneficial ownership of the suit property is concerned.
6. Counsel for the plaintiff urged the court to award her special damages of Kshs 47,340 based on the receipts which she produced. Regrettably, the plea for special damages in the sum of Kshs. 47,340 was neither pleaded nor prayed for. It cannot therefore be granted on the basis of the receipts, without the requisite pleadings.
7. With regard to the plea for damages for trespass, the defendant led evidence to indicate trespass. She did not, however, lead any evidence or make submissions relating to general damages for trespass. In the circumstances, the court will award her nominal damages assessed at Kshs 1,000,000. This figure takes into account the period of trespass which is from 9/11/2013 to date.
8. In light of the foregoing, the court makes the following disposal orders in the suit.
(a) An order of permanent injunction is hereby issued restraining the defendant together with his agents/servants from interfering with, trespassing upon, or in any manner whatsoever dealing with Plot No. W.445 in Nyumba Moja Women Group Land in Dandora, Nairobi.
(b) The defendant shall give vacant possession of the said property within 30 days from the date of service of the notice of entry of judgment herein. In default, peaceful eviction shall be effected under the supervision of the Area Officer Commanding Police Station upon confirming prior service of the notice of entery of judgment herein on the defendant.
(c) The plaintiff is awarded nominal damages for trespass in the sum of Kshs 1,000,000 against the defendant.
(d) The defendant shall bear costs of this suit.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI ON THIS 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2020.
B M EBOSO
JUDGE
In the Presence of: -
Mr Keyonzo for the plaintiff
Court Clerk – June