[2015] KEHC 4 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner had proved, on a balance of probabilities, the grounds of cruelty, adultery, and desertion as pleaded in the petition. The respondent failed to contest the petition or adduce any evidence in rebuttal. The evidence of the petitioner was uncontroverted and established that the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 4 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: CCT; Respondent: FN
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 1 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition allowed. Marriage dissolved. Custody and maintenance orders granted. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- NS Ndungu
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Custody of Children, Adultery, Cruelty, Desertion
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CCT
Petitioner
FN
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner has proved grounds for dissolution of marriage, namely cruelty, adultery, and desertion.
- 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to custody of the children as primary caregiver.
- 3 Whether the respondent should be ordered to contribute to the maintenance of the children.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner had proved, on a balance of probabilities, the grounds of cruelty, adultery, and desertion as pleaded in the petition. The respondent failed to contest the petition or adduce any evidence in rebuttal. The evidence of the petitioner was uncontroverted and established that the marriage had irretrievably broken down, with the parties not having lived together since 2003. The court was satisfied that the legal threshold for dissolution of marriage was met. The petitioner was also entitled to custody of the children as the primary caregiver and to an order for the respondent to contribute to their maintenance. No order as to costs was made as the petitioner...
Court Disposition
Petition allowed. Marriage dissolved. Custody and maintenance orders granted. No order as to costs.
Orders
- The marriage between the petitioner and respondent is dissolved.
- The petitioner is granted care, control, and custody of the children as the primary caregiver.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAKURU
DIVORCE CASE NO.1 OF 2014
CCT......................................PETITIONER
VERSUS
FN.....................................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. By way of a petition dated 14th January, 2014, the petitioner seeks orders that:
(a) The marriage between the petitioner and respondent be dissolved.
(b) The petitioner be granted care, control and custody of the issues of the marriage as the primary care giver.
(c) The petitioner do make periodical contributions towards maintenance of the issues of the marriage herein.
(d) That costs of the petition be provided for.
2. Despite evidence of service of a notice to appear, petition, verifying affidavit, statement, list of witnesses and list of documents, the Respondent did not enter appearance and/or file an answer to the petition.
3. Consequently, the matter was listed for hearing as an undefended cause with the petitioner being the only witness.
THE EVIDENCE
4. The Petitioner told the court that she got married to the Respondent in the year 2003. they were blessed with 3 children namely,RC, DC and JDC. She added that they had cohabited earlier before the marriage was solemnized in church.
5. The Respondent left the matrimonial home soon after the marriage, indeed in the same year (2003). He is currently married to another woman. He at one time committed adultery with their house help and got a child with her. He was cruel. At one time, he hit her on the head. He would abuse her. The last time they were together as husband and wife is in 2003. She stated that the marriage has broken down. She has not colluded with the Respondent to bring this petition.
6. The Petitioner asked the court to grant her divorce to enable her move on with life. She sought custody of the children and affirmed that she would continue taking care of them. She added that she was not asking for costs.
ANALYSIS
7. I have considered the petition and the grounds of cruelty, adultery and desertion raised thereon and the particulars given. I have put into account the evidence adduced by the Petitioner. She has testified on oath that the Respondent deserted her in 2003. She has added that the Respondent Committed adultery with a house help and got a child with her. She has testified that the Respondent now lives with another woman. It is her evidence that the Respondent at one time struck her on the head and used to abuse her. This evidence is not controverted by any other evidence, the Respondent having failed to file a response or make an appearance at the hearing.
FINDINGS
8. Based on the above analysis, it is clear that the Petitioner has ably discharged her duty to prove the grounds of cruelty, adultery and desertion pleaded in her petition. The 2 parties have not lived together since 2003 the Respondent having left the matrimonial home then. The evidence in support of the cruelty and adultery remains firm. I am satisfied that the petitioner herein has proved her case to the required degree. I enter judgment for the Petitioner in terms of prayers (a)(b) and (c) of the petition.
9. As the petitioner has waived her right to costs, I make no orders as to costs.
10. Orders accordingly.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Nakuru this 24th day of November, 2015
A. K. NDUNGU
JUDGE