[2015] KEELRC 1028 (KLR)

[2015] KEELRC 1028 (KLR)

The court found that it had indeed overlooked Clause I of the applicant's letter of appointment, which stipulated a three-month notice period for termination. This oversight justified a review of the original judgment under Rule 32 of the Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules, 2010. The court therefore substituted the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEELRC 1028 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Cecilia Muthoni Njoroge; Respondent: Nairobi Stock Exchange
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 344 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Judgment
Outcome
Application for review partially allowed.
Legal Topics
Review of Judgment, Notice Period Entitlement, Employment Contract Terms
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Review of Judgment Notice Period Entitlement Employment Contract Terms

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cecilia Muthoni Njoroge

Applicant

Nairobi Stock Exchange

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the court overlooked the contractual notice period in the original judgment.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to three months' salary in lieu of notice as per the employment contract.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to payment in lieu of leave days not taken.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that it had indeed overlooked Clause I of the applicant's letter of appointment, which stipulated a three-month notice period for termination. This oversight justified a review of the original judgment under Rule 32 of the Industrial Court (Procedure) Rules, 2010. The court therefore substituted the award of one month's salary in lieu of notice with an award of three months' salary in lieu of notice. However, the court declined to award payment in lieu of leave days not taken, as this relief was not pleaded in the Memorandum of Claim, and thus there was no basis for review on this issue.

Court Disposition

Application for review partially allowed.

Orders

  • The award of one month salary in lieu of notice is substituted with an award of three months' salary in lieu of notice in the sum of Kshs.877,781.61.
  • The prayer for payment in lieu of leave days not taken is declined.