[2020] KEELC 344 (KLR)

[2020] KEELC 344 (KLR)

The Environment and Land Court is unable to proceed with the petition at this stage because a final judgment was already rendered by the High Court, which found it lacked jurisdiction and transferred the file. The question now is whether any suit remains for disposal or whether the matter is functus officio. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEELC 344 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Cecilia Wanjiru Gicuru; Applicant: Japheth Etale; Respondent: The Hon. Attorney General; Respondent: The Inspector General of Police; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecution; Respondent: Kenya Airports Authority
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 18 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Directions Post Judgment Transfer
Outcome
Directions issued; no substantive orders made pending parties' submissions on jurisdiction and finality of judgment.
Judges
BM Eboso
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Courts, Transfer of Suits, Finality of Judgment
Source Language
en
Land and Property Constitutional Law Jurisdiction of Courts Transfer of Suits Finality of Judgment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cecilia Wanjiru Gicuru

Applicant

Japheth Etale

Applicant

The Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

The Inspector General of Police

Respondent

Director of Public Prosecution

Respondent

Kenya Airports Authority

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Directions Post Judgment Transfer

  1. 1 Whether the Environment and Land Court can reopen and hear a petition after a final judgment has been rendered by the High Court.
  2. 2 Whether there remains a suit capable of disposal following the High Court's finding on jurisdiction and final judgment.

Ratio Decidendi

The Environment and Land Court is unable to proceed with the petition at this stage because a final judgment was already rendered by the High Court, which found it lacked jurisdiction and transferred the file. The question now is whether any suit remains for disposal or whether the matter is functus officio. The court directs parties to address this issue before any further orders are made, as it is unclear if the petition can be reopened after a final judgment.

Court Disposition

Directions issued; no substantive orders made pending parties' submissions on jurisdiction and finality of judgment.

Orders

  • Parties to attend court on 2/2/2021 and address the issue of whether the petition can be reopened after a final judgment.
  • Counsel for the interested party to serve a copy of these directions on all parties.