[2007] KEHC 2741 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate any exceptional or unusual circumstances to justify bail or stay of execution pending appeal. There was no medical evidence provided regarding the applicant's alleged illness. Upon review of the trial proceedings and judgment, the court saw no likelihood of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] KEHC 2741 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Celestino Muriithi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 33 of 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal and Stay of Execution Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Stay of Execution, Conviction Appeal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Celestino Muriithi
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Bail Pending Appeal and Stay of Execution Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted bail pending appeal.
- 2 Whether there are exceptional or unusual circumstances to warrant bail or stay of execution.
- 3 Whether the appeal has high chances of success.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate any exceptional or unusual circumstances to justify bail or stay of execution pending appeal. There was no medical evidence provided regarding the applicant's alleged illness. Upon review of the trial proceedings and judgment, the court saw no likelihood of success in the appeal. Consequently, the application for bail and stay of execution was dismissed as it did not meet the legal threshold required for such relief.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for bail pending appeal and stay of execution is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
Criminal Appeal 33 of 2007
CELESTINO MURIITHI ……………....………………. APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC …………....……………………..……. RESPONDENT
(An appeal from the judgment of Hon. G. Oyugi, SRM dated 14th February, 2007 in
Tigania Senior Resident Magistrate Criminal Case No.2050 of 2006. )
RULING
The applicant herein was tried, convicted and sentenced to 20 years imprisonment by the court below (Mr. Oyugi, SRM).
The applicant being aggrieved by both the conviction and sentence has preferred this appeal. Meanwhile he has also brought the instant application in which he is seeking that he be admitted to bail and there be a stay of further execution of the judgment and sentence pending appeal.
That application is grounded on the facts that the appeal has high chances of success; that the offence is bailable, and that the applicant is sickly.
The application is opposed by counsel for the respondent who has argued that there is overwhelming evidence against the applicant and that there are no special circumstances to warrant the court to grant the application.
The foregoing arguments have duly been considered. Section 357(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, under which this application is expressed to be brought empowers the High Court to order that a person who has been convicted or sentenced be released on bail, or if that person is not so released, that the execution of the sentence or order appealed against be suspended pending appeal. It is now established that the court in considering application for bail pending appeal must not go into the merits of the intended appeal.
However, the likelihood of success of the appeal is a factor to be taken into consideration in dealing with such application.
An application for bail pending appeal can also be granted if there are exceptional or unusual circumstances.
See (Ademba V R)(1983) KLR 442. I have looked at the proceedings and the judgment of the trial as well as the petition of appeal and find no exceptional circumstances disclosed by the applicant to enable me to grant the prayers sought. There is no medical evidence of the nature of ailment he is suffering from.
Secondly from the evidence adduced in the subordinate court, I see no likelihood of success in the appeal. For these reasons, this application must fail.
The same is dismissed.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 11th DAY OF May, 2007
W. OUKO
JUDGE