[2023] KEHC 24895 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 24895 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant the grant of anticipatory bail, given the credible apprehension of arrest on alleged trumped up charges related to ongoing civil litigation. The court balanced the applicant's constitutional rights to liberty and fair process against...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 24895 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Davis Nathan Celogoi; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecution; Respondent: Inspector General of Police; Respondent: Directorate of Criminal Investigation; Respondent: Attorney General
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kibera
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E007 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Anticipatory Bail Application
Outcome
Application for anticipatory bail granted with conditions.
Judges
DR Kavedza
Legal Topics
Anticipatory Bail, Arrest and Detention, Constitutional Rights, Criminal Investigation
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Anticipatory Bail Arrest and Detention Constitutional Rights Criminal Investigation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Davis Nathan Celogoi

Applicant

Director of Public Prosecution

Respondent

Inspector General of Police

Respondent

Directorate of Criminal Investigation

Respondent

Attorney General

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Anticipatory Bail Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail pending arrest or charge.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents should be restrained from arresting or charging the applicant in relation to Nairobi ELC 312 of 2009.
  3. 3 Whether the respondents can continue investigations or prefer charges against the applicant while anticipatory bail is in force.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant the grant of anticipatory bail, given the credible apprehension of arrest on alleged trumped up charges related to ongoing civil litigation. The court balanced the applicant's constitutional rights to liberty and fair process against the public interest in investigation and prosecution of crime. Accordingly, the applicant was admitted to anticipatory bail of KES 100,000, with the condition that he present himself for questioning as directed. The court clarified that the respondents retain the right to investigate or charge the applicant, but may not arrest or detain him while the anticipatory bail is in...

Court Disposition

Application for anticipatory bail granted with conditions.

Orders

  • The application is certified urgent.
  • The applicant is admitted to anticipatory bail in the sum of KES 100,000 to be deposited in court.