[1996] KECA 130 (KLR)

[1996] KECA 130 (KLR)

The court exercised its discretion to grant the extension of time for service of the notice of appeal, noting that there was no objection from the respondents and the application was found to be meritorious. The interests of justice favored allowing the application, and the notice of appeal was deemed duly served...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1996] KECA 130 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Central Kenya Limited; Respondent: Trust Bank Limited; Respondent: Trust Finance Limited; Respondent: Floriculture International Ltd.; Respondent: First National Finance Ltd.; Respondent: Registrar of Titles
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 167 of 1996
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time for Service of Notice of Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed. Extension of time granted for service of notice of appeal.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Service of Notice, Appeals Process
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Service of Notice Appeals Process

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Central Kenya Limited

Applicant

Trust Bank Limited

Respondent

Trust Finance Limited

Respondent

Floriculture International Ltd.

Respondent

First National Finance Ltd.

Respondent

Registrar of Titles

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time for Service of Notice of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to serve the notice of appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court exercised its discretion to grant the extension of time for service of the notice of appeal, noting that there was no objection from the respondents and the application was found to be meritorious. The interests of justice favored allowing the application, and the notice of appeal was deemed duly served for the purposes of the intended appeal. Costs were ordered to be in the intended appeal, and the applicant was directed to file the appeal within 30 days.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Extension of time granted for service of notice of appeal.

Orders

  • Time for service of the Notice of Appeal dated 30th April, 1996 is extended.
  • The attached Notice is deemed duly and properly served on all interested parties for the purposes of the intended appeal.