[2009] KEHC 3044 (KLR)
The court found that Eunice Mbogo, the widow of the deceased 1st defendant, had not obtained letters of administration and therefore lacked legal capacity to bring the application or to represent the estate of the deceased in these proceedings. The application was made by a stranger to the suit and was supported by...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] KEHC 3044 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Centuary Oil Trading Co. Ltd; Defendant: Gerald M. Mwaniki; Defendant: George Wainaina T/A International Relief Services
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Case 14 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Declare Suit Abated or Strike Out Against 1st Defendant
- Outcome
- application dismissed with costs to the plaintiff
- Judges
- LK Kimaru
- Legal Topics
- Abatement of Suit, Substitution of Parties, Legal Capacity, Affidavit Incompetence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Centuary Oil Trading Co. Ltd
Plaintiff
Gerald M. Mwaniki
Defendant
George Wainaina T/A International Relief Services
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Declare Suit Abated or Strike Out Against 1st Defendant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suit against the 1st defendant should be declared abated due to failure to substitute a legal representative within the prescribed period.
- 2 Whether the application made by Eunice Mbogo is competent given her lack of letters of administration and legal capacity.
- 3 Whether the affidavit in support of the application is valid.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Eunice Mbogo, the widow of the deceased 1st defendant, had not obtained letters of administration and therefore lacked legal capacity to bring the application or to represent the estate of the deceased in these proceedings. The application was made by a stranger to the suit and was supported by an incompetent affidavit. As such, the application was unmeritorious and could not be sustained. The court dismissed the application with costs to the plaintiff, upholding the preliminary objection that only a duly appointed legal representative may seek substitution or abatement orders in respect of a deceased party.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with costs to the plaintiff
Orders
- The application to declare the suit abated or to strike out the suit against the 1st defendant is dismissed.
- Costs of the application are awarded to the plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI COMMERCIAL COURTS)
Civil Case 14 of 2006
CENTUARY OIL TRADING CO. LTD……………….……PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
GERALD M. MWANIKI…………………………...….1ST DEFENDANT
GEORGE WAINAINA
T/A INTERNATIONAL RELIEF SERVICES……….2ND DEFENDANT
RULING
Before me is an application made on behalf of the 1st defendant purportedly under the provisions of Order XXIII Rules 3and9 andOrder VI Rule 13 (b)and(d)of theCivil Procedure Rules seeking the orders of the court to declare the suit as against the 1st defendant to have abated. In the alternative, the applicant prays that the suit against the 1st defendant be struck out with costs. The grounds in support to the application are stated on the face of the application. The application is supported by the annexed affidavit of Eunice Mbogo. The application is opposed. The plaintiff filed a notice of preliminary objection in opposition to the application.
At the hearing of the application, I heard rival submissions made by Mrs. Karanu for the 1st defendant and Mr. Nyakundi for the plaintiff. I have carefully considered the said submissions. I have also read the pleadings filed by the parties in support of their respective opposing positions. Mrs. Karanu concedes that the application should have been predicated upon the provisions ofOrder XXIII Rule 4of theCivil Procedure Ruleinstead ofOrder XXIII Rule 3of the said rules. Rule 3 deals with applications in regard to plaintiffs who have died while Rule 4 deals with substitution of deceased defendants. Under the said Rule 4, a legal representative of a deceased defendant is required to make an application to be substituted as a party in the suit before the expiry of one year from the time of death of the deceased defendant. Rule 4(3) provides that if no such application is made within a year from the time of death of such defendant, the suit shall abate against such defendant.
In the present application, it is not disputed that the 1st defendant died on 9th February 2008. The applicant, Eunice Mbogo is the widow of the deceased defendant. By her own admission, she states that the legal representatives of the 1st defendant have not applied to be substituted as parties to these proceedings. There is no evidence on record that the said Eunice Mbogo has obtained letters of administration to administer the estate of her deceased husband. It is therefore clear that the objection of the plaintiff to the application has merit. The said Eunice Mbogo lacks legal capacity to agitate any proceedings on behalf of the estate of the 1st defendant in the absence of proof that she is the administrator of the estate of the said deceased. She lacks capacity to bring any proceedings before this court on behalf of the estate of the deceased because she is not recognized in law as the person who has legal authority to administer the estate of the deceased.
The application has been made by a stranger to these proceedings and supported by an incompetent affidavit. It is therefore unmeritorious. It is dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 1ST DAY OF JULY 2009
L. KIMARU
JUDGE