[2014] KEHC 5434 (KLR)

[2014] KEHC 5434 (KLR)

The court found that the Notice of Motion was filed 29 days out of time, contrary to the leave granted which required filing within 21 days. As such, the application was incompetent for want of compliance with procedural timelines. Additionally, the court held that any disputes arising from the former Land Disputes...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEHC 5434 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Chairman, Treasurer, Secretary & Board of Governors, Gitare Primary School; Respondent: Chairman, Embu West District & Disputes Tribunal; Respondent: Hon. Attorney General; Interested Party: Tirus Njiru Kirimui & Others
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Embu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Judicial Review 28 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/strike Out Motion
Outcome
application struck out
Legal Topics
Judicial Review Timelines, Leave of Court, Tribunal Jurisdiction, Environment and Land Court Jurisdiction
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Judicial Review Timelines Leave of Court Tribunal Jurisdiction Environment and Land Court Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Chairman, Treasurer, Secretary & Board of Governors, Gitare Primary School

Applicant

Chairman, Embu West District & Disputes Tribunal

Respondent

Hon. Attorney General

Respondent

Tirus Njiru Kirimui & Others

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Ruling on Preliminary Objection/strike Out Motion

  1. 1 Whether the Notice of Motion was filed within the statutory period after leave was granted.
  2. 2 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction over disputes arising from the former Land Disputes Tribunal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Notice of Motion was filed 29 days out of time, contrary to the leave granted which required filing within 21 days. As such, the application was incompetent for want of compliance with procedural timelines. Additionally, the court held that any disputes arising from the former Land Disputes Tribunal fall within the jurisdiction of the Environment & Land Court, not the High Court. Consequently, the application was struck out with costs to the interested parties.

Court Disposition

application struck out

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 4/1/2013 is struck out as incompetent.
  • Applicants to pay costs.