[2024] KEHC 7795 (KLR)
The High Court found that the application arose from matters already determined and finalized by the Environment and Land Court, including the issuance of a certificate of taxation and execution proceedings. The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application, as the subject matter belonged to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 7795 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Chaka Limited; Applicant: David Kiprono Sudi; Applicant: Eunice Kibule Sudi; Respondent: Wiskam Auctioneers; Respondent: Jogan Auctioneers
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application E672 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- JN Mulwa
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Court, Res Judicata, Injunctive Relief, Execution of Decree
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chaka Limited
Applicant
David Kiprono Sudi
Applicant
Eunice Kibule Sudi
Applicant
Wiskam Auctioneers
Respondent
Jogan Auctioneers
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to entertain an application arising from matters finalized by the Environment and Land Court.
- 2 Whether the application is res judicata.
- 3 Whether the applicants are entitled to injunctive relief restraining auction and impounding of motor vehicles.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found that the application arose from matters already determined and finalized by the Environment and Land Court, including the issuance of a certificate of taxation and execution proceedings. The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the application, as the subject matter belonged to the docket of the Environment and Land Court. Furthermore, the application was deemed res judicata, having been previously litigated and determined. Consequently, the application was dismissed as both incompetent and barred by the doctrine of res judicata, with costs awarded to the respondents.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application is dismissed for want of jurisdiction and for being res judicata.
- Costs awarded to the respondents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
Chaka Limited & 2 others v Wiskam Auctioneers & another (Miscellaneous Civil Application E672 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 7795 (KLR) (Civ) (22 March 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 7795 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Civil
Miscellaneous Civil Application E672 of 2023
JN Mulwa, J
March 22, 2024
Between
Chaka Limited
1st Applicant
David Kiprono Sudi
2nd Applicant
Eunice Kibule Sudi
3rd Applicant
and
Wiskam Auctioneers
1st Respondent
Jogan Auctioneers
2nd Respondent
Ruling
1. The Applicants before this Court filed a Notice of Motion Application dated 16/8/2023 under Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution, Sections 3,5, and 7 of the Magistrates Courts Act, Sections 1B,3,3A of the Civil Procedure Act and Order 21, 22, and 40 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules. They seek for an unnamed Interested Party to be restrained from auctioning Motor vehicles KBZ 055K and KAM 222V and an injunction restraining the OCPD Kilimani Division and Ngong Stations from impounding their motor vehicles pending the hearing and determination of the complaint before the Auctioneers licensing board.The Application is supported by the grounds on its face and a supporting affidavit sworn by David Kiprono Sudi on 16/8/2023.
2. In opposing the Application, the Defendants filed a Replying Affidavit sworn on 23/10/2023 terming the Application as an afterthought and an attempt to obstruct the execution process.
3. The court has considered the application, the supporting and opposing affidavits as well as oral arguments by the parties advocates on 14/1/2023. On 30/5/2017 eviction warrants in relation to L.R. No. 209/9749 were issued to the 1st Defendant against Grace Wairimu Sorora pursuant to the Judgment of the Environment and Land Court in ELC No.592/2010. Subsequently, the Defendant’s bill of costs was filed and taxed and on 28/02/2023 a certificate of taxation was issued. The Respondents in recovering their costs attached the Applicants motor vehicles.
4. By an Application dated 20/4/2023 the Applicants sought leave for the firm of Ham and Hansley to come on record, and to file a reference before a Judge of the ELC, lifting of warrants of attachment, setting aside of the decree and release of the impounded motor vehicle. The application was dismissed by the court on 18/05/2023. The Applicants also initiated a complaint against the 2nd Defendant before the Auctioneers Board for charging a fee of Kshs. 250,000/= taking into account the balance of the decretal sum of Kshs. 1,770,000/=.
5. Before moving further, it is noted that this application arose from matters that were dealt with and finalized before the Environment and Land Court in whose docket it belongs. The Certificate of Taxation was issued by the Taxing master of the said court. Without further interrogation of the merits or otherwise of the application this court finds itself without jurisdiction to entertain the matter that is already resolved by the ELC. It is not only resjudicata but also incompetently filed in this court. The application is dismissed with costs to the Respondents.
DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 22NDDAY OF MARCH, 2024. J. N. MULWAJUDGE