[2001] KECA 265 (KLR)
The Court found that the applicant had an arguable appeal regarding the awards for special damages (artificial arm, vocational therapy, loss of future earnings, and domestic help) because these items were not pleaded in the plaint, as conceded by the respondent. The law requires that special damages be specifically...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] KECA 265 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Chandaria Industries Limited; Respondent: Mathew Agwingi
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Application 313 of 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Intended Appeal
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part.
- Judges
- RO Kwach, AB Shah
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Personal Injury, Special Damages Pleading, Quantification of Damages
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chandaria Industries Limited
Applicant
Mathew Agwingi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Intended Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated an arguable appeal to justify a stay of execution.
- 2 Whether the award for pain and suffering was excessive or in line with precedent.
- 3 Whether the awards for special damages (artificial arm, vocational therapy, loss of future earnings, domestic help) were properly pleaded and proved.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the applicant had an arguable appeal regarding the awards for special damages (artificial arm, vocational therapy, loss of future earnings, and domestic help) because these items were not pleaded in the plaint, as conceded by the respondent. The law requires that special damages be specifically pleaded and proved. However, the Court found no error of principle in the award for pain and suffering, given the severity of the respondent's injury (loss of right hand). Consequently, the Court granted a stay of execution only in respect of the unpleaded special damages, allowing execution to proceed for the amount awarded for pain and suffering.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part.
Orders
- Stay of execution of the decree to the extent of Shs 1,142,000 (items 2-5) only, pending hearing and determination of the intended appeal.
- Execution may proceed for Shs 500,000 awarded for pain and suffering.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI CORAM: KWACH, SHAH & BOSIRE, JJ.A. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI. 313 OF 2000
BETWEEN
CHANDARIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED ................................APPLICANT
AND
MATHEW AGWINGI ......................................................RESPONDENT
(An application for stay of execution in an intended appeal from a judgment & decree of the High Court of Kenya at Nairobi (Hon. Mr. Justice Mulwa) dated 5th November, 2000
in
H.C.C.C. NO. 1871 OF 1999) *************
RULING OF THE COURT
This is an application byChandaria Industries Limited (the applicant)under rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules for a stay of execution of the judgment and decree of Kasanga Mulwa Jgiven on 5th October, 2000.
Mathew Agwingi , (the respondent)sued the applicant in the superior court claiming damages for personal injuries he sustained on 11th August, 1994 while feeding paper into a machine in a factory owned by the applicant.The respondent lost his right hand in the accident. The Judge found as a fact that the applicant knew that the machine in question was dangerous. Witnesses called by the applicant testified that the respondent had not been assigned to work on the machine and that his duty was only to collect papers which fell on the ground. The learned Judge rejected this evidence, and he may well have been right, because whatever the position was, the respondent may have been operating the machine for the benefit of the applicant.
The learned Judge gave judgment for the respondent for Shs 1,642,000/- which included (1) Shs 500,000/- for pain and suffering; (2) Shs 200,000/- for the cost of artificial arm; (3) Shs 100,000/- vocational therapy; (4) Shs 492,000/- for the loss of future earning; and (5) Shs 150,000/- for domestic help.Mr Mbugua , for the applicant, submitted that the award of Shs 500,000/- for pain and suffering is excessive and way out of line with awards usually made under that item, but taking into account that the respondent lost his right hand in the accident the amount may well be sustained. As for the sums awarded under items (2) to (5), he said these had not been pleaded although the learned Judge allowed evidence to be led in support of the claims. He submitted that being claims for special damages the law requires not only that they be proved, but also that they must be pleaded. Counsel for the respondent conceded that the plaint was never amended to include these claims. In respect of this part of the award therefore, there can be no doubt that the applicant has an arguable appeal. But we can detect no error of principle in respect of the sum of Shs 500,000/- awarded for pain and suffering.
In the result, we allow this application and grant a stay of execution of the decree to the extent of Shs 1,142,000/- (items 2-5) only, pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal. But for Shs 500,000/- awarded for pain and suffering, execution may proceed. Costs of the application to be in the intended appeal.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 30th day of March, 2001.
R. O. KWACH
.........................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
A. B. SHAH
.....................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
S.E.O. BOSIRE
...........................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR