[2024] KEHC 2997 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 2997 (KLR)

The High Court found that the trial court failed to credit the applicant with the period spent in remand custody as required by section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant was arrested on 30th April 2020, took plea on 4th May 2020, and was released on bail after surety approval on 15th May 2020. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 2997 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Elison Mutungati Sheikh Chandi; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E878 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Credit of Remand Period
Outcome
application allowed in part
Judges
K Kimondo
Legal Topics
Sentencing Credit, Remand Custody, Revision Jurisdiction, False Pretenses
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Credit Remand Custody Revision Jurisdiction False Pretenses

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Elison Mutungati Sheikh Chandi

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Credit of Remand Period

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to have the period spent in remand custody credited against his sentence.
  2. 2 Whether the trial court erred by failing to consider the remand period under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court found that the trial court failed to credit the applicant with the period spent in remand custody as required by section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant was arrested on 30th April 2020, took plea on 4th May 2020, and was released on bail after surety approval on 15th May 2020. The applicant was sentenced on 9th October 2023. The court held that any period spent in remand custody between arrest and sentencing, excluding days when the applicant was out on bond, must be deducted from the sentence. The court relied on statutory and appellate authority to ensure the applicant receives the benefit of time already served in custody.

Court Disposition

application allowed in part

Orders

  • Any period spent in remand custody from arrest on 30th April 2020 to the date of sentence on 9th October 2023, excluding days out on bond, shall be deducted from the sentence.
  • The applicant shall be immediately notified of this order.